Skip to main content

Stricter voting laws - what some middle-aged white men just don't get

When scrolling through my "friends'" Facebook comments yesterday on my newsfeed, I came across the following status from a 40-year old far right-wing white man: "When I voted today, the people at the poll asked me for identification. Surprisingly, it didn't offend me one bit. It was also very little hassle. Wierd right? Based in what I had heard I was sure I would feel oppressed, embarassed and violated. What a pleasant surprise!"

While trying to sound like a smarta*s, he wound up sounding like a dumb one. The three groups most affected by stricter voter ID laws are: Elders, minorities, and women. Elders and minorities are more prone than other groups to not have the necessary voter identification to make their voices heard on election day, while women run into problems because of name changes due to marriages. Whenever a person such as the before-mentioned one makes a sarcastic comment about voter suppression, I wish for a split-second he was a 90-year old woman who had been married seven different times when trying to vote on election day. Then and only then, would he garner a full understanding of what some people have to go through when trying to vote.

By making such an ignorant statement, I wouldn't put it past him to make the following declarations:

- "What's the big deal about carrying around a baby for nine months? I gave a kid a piggy back ride for nine minutes and my back doesn't hurt."

- "After 9/11, I walked through the metal detector without any problems. I wasn't even frisked! So what are those darn Muslims whining about? Geez!"

- "I walked through a gated-community without getting followed by a watchdog or anything. Those stories blacks made up just don't make much sense now, do they?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i...