Skip to main content

Fox News: "Obamacare is worse than Hurricane Katrina and the Iraq War!"

Fox News anchor and blonde woman #47 on the channel - Martha MacCallum - recently said the following about Obamacare:

"What I keep coming back to in all of this is unlike other issues - Katrina or the Iraq war-this is something that touches so many people's lives across the country and you don't know whether the president is going to be able to successfully dodge it."

Really? A healthcare plan touches many people's lives across this country, but war and natural disasters don't? How many soldiers died in Iraq? How long were some of them overseas? How were they when the came back home? How were their families? How many lives were impacted by Hurricane Katrina? How many were killed? How many lost their homes? How long will it take for New Orleans to fully rebound? Will it ever fully recover? What were the damage costs in both Iraq and Louisiana?

What Fox News talking heads and other conservative commentators are failing to realize with their asinine comparisons between Obamacare and Hurricane Katrina and the Iraq War is the fact that, whether they want to believe it or not, the intent of the Affordable Care Act is a positive one. The intent is to provide more people with health coverage, require a higher standard of coverage, and lower costs. Will there be unfortunate scenarios when surgeries aren't successful and people die as a result? Yes, but that's the way it's always been. The Affordable Care Act's intent is to help save lives and money. It will undoubtedly touch people's lives, but the intent and likely end result is and will be a positive one. That's not the case with sending soldiers off to war under false pretenses or reacting slowly to a natural disaster. The intent of the former was awful and the intent of the latter was seemingly one of indifference. Putting soldiers in harm's way based on a lie and taking a great deal of time to provide proper aid to New Orleans after a devastating hurricane is drastically different than trying to improve this nation's health, and with that, our lives, through healthcare reform.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/25/fox-news-obamacare-katrina-iraq-war-martha-maccallum_n_4339143.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...