Skip to main content

A gotcha question for Donald Trump: "If 'is' is 'profiling,' what is 'is'?"

During President Obama's speech last night with regard to the San Bernardino shooting and battling ISIL, he said this:

"Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors; our co-workers, our sports heroes - and yes, they are our men and women in uniform."

At this, GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump decided to tweet the following response:

"Obama said in his speech that Muslims are our sports heroes. What sport is he talking about, and who? Is Obama profiling?"

First off, Trump has taken multiple photographs with former heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali, not to mention gotten into a spat with the NBA's all-time leading scorer, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

Secondly, though, it appears The Donald knows profiling about as well as he knows how to be specific when answering questions. Since the president was speaking about Muslims, it appears as though Mr. Trump was referring to racial profiling. Allow me to define that for him:

"The use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense."

Let's look at the president's statement again:

"Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors; our co-workers, our sports heroes - and yes, they are our men and women in uniform."

Mr. Trump, care to weigh in on this?

"Obama said in his speech that Muslims are our sports heroes. What sport is he talking about, and who? Is Obama (profiling) using the race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense?"

Yes, his statement appears even dumber now, doesn't it? I can just hear him engaging in the following back and forth if he were a contestant on Jeopardy:

Alex Trebek: "The answer is, 'Complimenting a religious minority community, making them feel welcome, making mention of their multiple achievements to help progress a nation.'"

Donald Trump: "What is profiling?"

Trebek: "I'm sorry, but no, and you're an idiot."


On that note, expect The Donald to utter the following in the future:

Initial statement: "I can use both hands equally well."

Donald Trump's reaction: "Oh, so you're dyslexic? Cool."


Initial statement: "I was actually born in Amsterdam."

Donald Trump's response: "That's pretty sweet. I'm part Danish too."


Initial statement: "I don't fully believe there is a God, yet don't fully believe there isn't one. I haven't been convinced either way."

Donald Trump's response: "Oh, so you're one of those logistics, aren't ya?"


Initial statement: "I've suffered from seizures for a number of years."

Donald Trump's response: "You know, I once a knew a guy who suffered from epilogues too."


Initial statement: "I'm about to earn a degree in sociology. I just wanted to ask..."

Donald Trump's response: "Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! Get this guy out of here! I don't want any socialists at my rally!"

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-forgets-muslim-champions-during-obama-criticism-n475306

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more