A gotcha question for Donald Trump: "If 'is' is 'profiling,' what is 'is'?"

During President Obama's speech last night with regard to the San Bernardino shooting and battling ISIL, he said this:

"Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors; our co-workers, our sports heroes - and yes, they are our men and women in uniform."

At this, GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump decided to tweet the following response:

"Obama said in his speech that Muslims are our sports heroes. What sport is he talking about, and who? Is Obama profiling?"

First off, Trump has taken multiple photographs with former heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali, not to mention gotten into a spat with the NBA's all-time leading scorer, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

Secondly, though, it appears The Donald knows profiling about as well as he knows how to be specific when answering questions. Since the president was speaking about Muslims, it appears as though Mr. Trump was referring to racial profiling. Allow me to define that for him:

"The use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense."

Let's look at the president's statement again:

"Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors; our co-workers, our sports heroes - and yes, they are our men and women in uniform."

Mr. Trump, care to weigh in on this?

"Obama said in his speech that Muslims are our sports heroes. What sport is he talking about, and who? Is Obama (profiling) using the race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense?"

Yes, his statement appears even dumber now, doesn't it? I can just hear him engaging in the following back and forth if he were a contestant on Jeopardy:

Alex Trebek: "The answer is, 'Complimenting a religious minority community, making them feel welcome, making mention of their multiple achievements to help progress a nation.'"

Donald Trump: "What is profiling?"

Trebek: "I'm sorry, but no, and you're an idiot."

On that note, expect The Donald to utter the following in the future:

Initial statement: "I can use both hands equally well."

Donald Trump's reaction: "Oh, so you're dyslexic? Cool."

Initial statement: "I was actually born in Amsterdam."

Donald Trump's response: "That's pretty sweet. I'm part Danish too."

Initial statement: "I don't fully believe there is a God, yet don't fully believe there isn't one. I haven't been convinced either way."

Donald Trump's response: "Oh, so you're one of those logistics, aren't ya?"

Initial statement: "I've suffered from seizures for a number of years."

Donald Trump's response: "You know, I once a knew a guy who suffered from epilogues too."

Initial statement: "I'm about to earn a degree in sociology. I just wanted to ask..."

Donald Trump's response: "Whoa! Whoa! Whoa! Get this guy out of here! I don't want any socialists at my rally!"

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-forgets-muslim-champions-during-obama-criticism-n475306

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"

The Kind-Hearted Smart Aleck

Search This Blog