Skip to main content

I'm not pro-Islam, anti-Christianity; I'm anti-double-standard, pro-consistency

Many Christian conservatives and even atheist liberals complain that progressives like myself are inconsistent when it comes to our views and defenses of religion. They often times say, "You guys have a double-standard, where you openly mock and criticize Christianity, but oddly defend Islam. Look at how Muslim countries treat women!"

I, for one, am not a big fan of organized religion. I was raised in a Christian household, regularly attended a nondenominational church with my mother and brother growing up, yet reached a point in my teenage years where I could no longer espouse myself to the typically sexist, anti-LGBT, anti-progressive rhetoric. The pastor's sermons started sounding progressively more like a Rush Limbaugh rant and it turned me off from the Christian faith, and honestly, organized religion altogether. Through my high school years, college, and even after, I found myself still oddly fascinated by the concept of religion. I read books about: Christianity, Satanism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Christian Science, Mormonism, Seventh-Day Adventism, Taoism, etc. I took college courses centering around world religions, even one which was called, "Philosophy of Religion." Through it all, I never found a religion which suited my ideals and compelled me enough to regularly attend services, however, it still fascinates me, and whether or not I agree with one's religious views, I feel they should be able to freely believe in and worship as they so choose.

Having said that, when I defend Muslims' rights in this country, I'm not defending how some Muslim-dominated countries treat women, just like when I defend Christians' rights in this country, I'm not defending how some Christian-nominated nations treat homosexuals. It sickens me how women are treated in some Middle Eastern countries. It sickens me how homosexuals are treated in some African countries. Heck, even though the United States has progressed far more than those nations when it comes to women's and LGBT rights, it still sickens me how they're treated here at times. When I mock and criticize Christianity, it's not because I don't believe Christians should be afforded 1st Amendment rights like everyone else; it's because that's the faith most practiced in this country and many Christians seem to feel they should be afforded more rights than those of any other faith, Muslims in particular.

I simply want for us to be more consistent, to cut it out with the double-standards. When a radical Christian opened fire on a Planned Parenthood facility in Colorado Springs, Colorado a couple of weeks ago, while his actions shouldn't be seen as representative of the religion or its followers, neither should the Muslims who opened fire in San Bernardino, California last week. Like Christians when it comes to building churches, Muslims shouldn't have to jump through extra hoops to build mosques. Just like Christians aren't often prejudged in this country for their faith, neither should Muslims be, or people of any other faith. I don't believe in special privileges for any particular demographic; I believe in equality. Granting the LGBT community marriage rights isn't a sign of privilege; it's a sign of equality. Providing women equal pay for equal work isn't about privilege; it's about equality. Affording Muslims equal protections under the 1st Amendment of the Constitution isn't a special privilege; it's equality. I may not be female, black, gay, nor religious, yet I will continue to fight for each and every person to attain equal rights under the law, for if one of our American brothers or sisters lacks this equality, what does the American flag and the Star-Spangled Banner actually symbolize?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"