Skip to main content

A well written Columbus Dispatch letter-to-the-editor

As regular readers should know by now, I'm often critical of the Columbus Dispatch, which letters-to-the-editor they publish, and their often times misleading headlines with regard to said letters. However, I came across one letter today which I found to be well written, interesting, thought-provoking, and felt the need to share it.

The letter was written by Kevin Gainer of Westerville, entitled "Religion has been wired in our brains," and reads as follows:

"The overwhelming coverage lately of religion and terror prompts me to write. It’s no coincidence that I have never read a headline “Atheist terror group kills dozens.”

Atheists, as well as agnostics, are for the most part not susceptible to the type and degree of religious brainwashing that leads to mass terror attacks. It is at the end of such brainwashing, albeit often in combination with other defects of the mind, that we have witnessed religious terror for thousands of years.

Even fancifully, one might think that in the present scientific era, religious terror could be eliminated by converting everyone to atheism. But science and objective reality reveal that the mental process underpinning faith in a religion of any sort is simply an artifact of evolution.

Consequently — this is the unfortunate reality that we all have to deal with — religious beliefs, even as they are patently illogical and insubstantial, are not a removable aspect of human affairs. The bottom line is we truly have here not only a serious conundrum but a problem in human affairs for which there is no known global or enduring solution."

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2015/12/16/1-religion-has-been-wired.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"