Skip to main content

Kurt Russell gets deep about terrorism, guns, and stuff...

Actor Kurt Russell decided to show he's still a macho man when he went on an anti-gun control rant in a recent interview with the blog Hollywood Elsewhere. The has-been, I mean, "star," said this:

"If you think gun control is going to change the terrorists' point of view, I think you're, like, out of your mind. I think it's absolutely insane. The problem - the problem that we're having right now to turn it around ... you may think you've got me worried about what you're gonna do? Dude, you're about to find out what I'm gonna do, and that's gonna worry you a lot more. And that's what we need. If I'm a hockey team and I've got some guy bearing down on me as a goaltender, I'm not concerned about what he's gonna do. I'm gonna make him concerned about what I'm gonna do... They can make a bomb pretty easily. So what? They can also get knives and stab you. What are you gonna do about that? They can also get cars and run you over. What are you gonna do about that? What are you gonna do? Outlaw everything? That isn't the answer."

Oh, how I love these anti-gun law rants. If only Socrates, Plato, Shakespeare, and Einstein could hear them... In all seriousness, though, what had Russell been smoking prior to making these comments? A hockey analogy? Seriously? Worse yet, the analogy doesn't make much sense. If he were a goaltender and someone was bearing down on him, that would be a penalty, and the referee would send the guy to the penalty box for a couple of minutes. If he were to follow through with what he insinuates and comes after a player on the ice, the odds are fairly high he'll be penalized as well, and the back-up goalie may get some playing time as a result.

Russell then resorts to false equivalence and slippery slope fallacies to get his "point" across. Laws aren't put in place to be 100% perfect. Laws get broken on a daily basis. They're there to establish some semblance of order and decrease the odds of citizens placing themselves and/or others at risk, which could lead to injuries or death. So no, additional gun laws wouldn't result in a complete halt to gun violence. However, it would likely decrease the odds of such crimes being committed, resulting in fewer victims. Would some criminals or terrorists still go on to break gun laws? Sure. However, is that reason enough to not pass said gun laws in order to decrease the frequency of such unfortunate occurrences? No. If we're going to go by that logic, what's the point of having any laws at all? "Well, some people are going to speed on the highways regardless of the law, so what point is there to having speed limits at all?" Also, would Mr. Russell be in favor of people being provided a driver's license without passing eye, written, and driving tests? To be handed a license with minimal time behind the wheel? Would he feel safe on the roads if this were the case? I highly doubt it. Lastly, Russell seems to have gone the paranoid route with his final comment. Since when is closing background-check loopholes outlawing guns? Since when is requiring a longer wait-period outlawing guns? Kurt Russell can continue to think he's Mr. tough guy and that he can take down ISIS by himself, but to not be at all bothered by domestic terrorists regularly purchasing firearms in this country with more ease than if they were to buy Sudafed, and to speak out against banning these terrorists from making said purchases is, how did Russell phrase it again? Oh, that's right, "absolutely insane."

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/262873-kurt-russell-gun-control-wont-stop-terrorists

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Trump's Lie Tally at the CNN Debate

1) "We had the greatest economy in the history of our country. We had never done so well. Every – everybody was amazed by it. Other countries were copying us." 2) "But the thing we never got the credit for, and we should have, is getting us out of that COVID mess." 3) "The only jobs he created are for illegal immigrants and bounceback jobs; they’re bounced back from the COVID." 4) "Not going to drive them higher. It’s just going to cause countries that have been ripping us off for years, like China and many others, in all fairness to China – it’s going to just force them to pay us a lot of money, reduce our deficit tremendously, and give us a lot of power for other things." (tariffs) 5) "He also said he inherited 9 percent inflation." 6) "No, he inherited almost no inflation and it stayed that way for 14 months. And then it blew up under his leadership, because they spent money like a bunch of people that didn’t know what t...