Skip to main content

Adapting to Change

Whose responsibility is it in this country? The newcomers? The newborns? The elders? Those that were born and raised here?

I just read a blog that it was the newcomers' responsibility, that America has a particular culture and we shouldn't adapt to those immigrating our land. It should be the other way around.

She mentioned how everything has changed, that we can't say "Merry Christmas" anymore (even though I just wrote it). It has to be "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" and that offends her.

Alright, so let me ask her this question. Does she think that African-Americans should still be slaves? That they shouldn't have the right to vote? That all our schools should still be segregated? That bathrooms should be separated for Anglo- and African-Americans? Give me a break.

Change comes with the territory, especially in a Republic or "Democracy" like ours. Unless we want a dictatorship, we have to get use to change. I don't care how much one hates change or even the thought of change. Things change on a daily basis for everyone. We all have to adapt in our own way. For the Latinos from Central America that come to this country, they have to adapt to our way of life, just as we have to adapt to theirs. And honestly, they have a lot more to adapt to than the rest of the country. If I just up and moved to Mexico, I'd have a lot more to adapt to than the rest of that country. The rest of Mexico could live the way they were living before. I'd be the one having to make extreme changes in my life and adapt to their way of living. Same with those entering our country. The rest of us can continue to live our lives the way we were. They're the ones making a big change.

When it comes to America's culture and way of life, we're a diverse population that, for the most part, is a fairly peaceful group. Natives, Asians, Africans, Latinos, Indians, Anglos all coexist here. We may speak cruelly or disrespectfully toward another group of people. There may be protests, like in regard to immigration, but we're not in a civil war over the matter, such as that transpiring in Iraq.

It's no crime to say Merry Christmas. That is the holiday most celebrated in this country in December, because the majority of this country is Christian in their faith. But it's no crime to say "Happy Holidays" either. Sometimes, I think people take that way too personally. I mean, it may be the easy way out, but you could say "Happy Holiday(s)" pretty much any month of the year. When Thanksgiving approaches, Easter, New Year's, Valentine's Day, Christmas, whatever, telling someone, "I hope you have a great holiday weekend" or "Have fun during the holiday" is no crime. It's kind. They're not telling you that they disrespect your religion or beliefs. They're just trying to be kind and courteous and wish you and your loved ones a happy holiday, whatever that particular holiday might be.

I know change may be hard for some (harder for others), but let's not blow things out of proportion please. America's culture is still in tact. We're a very diverse nation, whom for the most part, get along decently and we should be proud of that. That's one reason that America is so beautiful.

Remember, not being able to change means not being able to progress. If it weren't for change, women wouldn't have the right to vote. If it weren't for change, African-Americans would still be slaves. If it weren't for change, we may very well have had only one voice, and because of that, not the Republic or "Democracy" that we have today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"