Skip to main content

No Rules

What I love about art (the arts) more than anything is the fact that it holds no particular rules or boundaries. I even wrote a poem about this a while back, entitled, "No Rules."

If you try to change the rules in math and decide that 2 + 2 = 7, sure, in your new world of math, that may be correct, but the teacher won't mark it down that way.

If you decide that your boss's layout for a project isn't quality enough, so you decide to change things here and there, you might as well go looking for a new job.

If you want to see a movie, but don't want to pay for it, unless you have connections, then good luck.

If you decide to go 100 in a 55, expect to get pulled over for doing 45 over the speed limit.

Everywhere else in life, there are non-stop rules, boundaries and guidelines enforced on us. At work, school, at theaters, concerts, bars, in relationships, with the family, parenting, driving, but not in art. While there is a certain formula used in all other areas to make things function in a consistent and reliable fashion, there is no one formula used to determine the success and impact of art.

An old friend of mine, actually, a gal I dated for 2-3 weeks, read a poem of mine one day and told me that while it was good, it didn't follow the guidelines and rules that poems are supposed to follow. I was completely baffled by this statement. I mean, it would've been one thing to say that the poem was garbage, but to say that it didn't follow the "rules" in poetry (art) made me laugh. E.E. Cummings, did he follow these rules? Poe? Frost? Dickinson? Van Gogh? Dali? Monet? Picasso? Elvis? The Beatles? Jimi Hendrix? Alfred Hitchcock? Stanley Kubrick? Kurt Vonnegut? King?

These people and others didn't follow the guidelines, because there aren't any. Art would not be so unique and beautiful if it had to be a certain way. If all books looked alike, all poems looked alike, all music sounded alike, all films were shot and acted alike and all paintings looked alike, art would not be unique and special. It'd be like anything else with so many rules and boundaries, a programmed robot could partake in them.

Art is the voice, expression and freedom of humans coming to the forefront. As long as we have art, we have some bit of freedom. If and when some people attempt to put a stranglehold on it, that's when it's time to speak up to make sure that regardless of all other rules and boundaries we have in our lives, we can still feel free with art.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"