Skip to main content

Flip-Floppers (in general)

Of course, there's flip-flopping in politics, but there are plenty of people outside of politics who flip-flop regularly as well.

Know anyone like this? It gets a tad annoying, doesn't it? One day, they may complain about someone they're dating. The next day, they absolutely hate the person they're dating. The third day, they're in love with this same person. Fourth day, they're not sure if things are going to work. Fifth day, things are good again, but not great. Sixth day, he or she mentions that there's definitely a mutual attraction on a physical level, but they're not sure if that's all it is. Seventh day, they break up. Eighth day, they're boyfriend and girlfriend again. Ever know anyone like that?

Flip-flopping happens sometimes. We have the right to change our minds about something or our viewpoints as we learn about and experience new things. But if anything is done in excess, it can get to be quite irritating, just like in the example above. Flip-flopping once in a great while is tolerable, because we all do it here and there. But flip-flopping about the same topic on an average of once per day for a week or two? That's annoying. After a while, it just becomes the norm and you don't think anything of it anymore.

It's like if someone used space fillers a great deal, such as the word "like" or if vulgar words spit out of a person's mouth two times in an average sentence. If someone says the word "like" once in a while or swears every now and again, then it's tolerable. The vulgar language may even be more effective, since it's not constant. If they're used consistent and often, then the only words one hears anymore are "like, like and like, like whatever, like totally" or the expletives. When one has gotten used to it (in a way), then it becomes a regular expectation. Going into the conversation, one then expects the excessive space fillers or profanities and it just becomes "normal."

A person isn't going to think anything of the flip-flopping if it continues consistently for a long period of time. They'll probably give up in trying to help out with the situation, because regardless of what they say, they know darn well the other person isn't going to listen and is going to flip-flop the next day (and the day after). It's then common for the listening party to wonder about the friendship or to ponder about if they ever knew the person at all. It's like with former President Bush's constant flip-flopping. While he may have appeased some conservatives, many scratched their heads and wondered who this guy was and what he truly believed.  Same thing in this situation. We're not going to know who that person truly is, what they feel or what they believe, if they constantly change their minds. It's very confusing if one thinks about it enough. I used to, but have chosen to give my mind a break, because whether or not I analyze the situation properly, it'd never amount to anything with a constant flip-flopper.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"