Skip to main content

Last Resort

Ever have a last resort? You know, that person you can always depend on to be there if you want to talk or do something, but they're not quite your favorite person in the world? You approach the situation and say something like, "Well, I guess I'll call (fill in the blank)." Ever wonder if that person knows that they're the last resort? When they hear your voice, do they automatically know why it is you're calling. "Ah, it's (your name). I guess no one else is available today, so he/she called me. Whatever, I've got nothing better to do." Or do they have no idea and are actually thrilled when you call? "Oh wow! I haven't talked to you for a while! How have you been? Good, I hope. Want to get together and do something?"

Is it common for people to have that last resort, just in case friends and family are extremely busy on a particular day and we're really wanting to get out and do something? It doesn't really matter who with, so long as we're out and about?

What about when the tables are turned and you're the last resort? Ever think about that? How does that feel? Do you automatically know when you hear that person's voice or are you excited just to be talking to them? It's a different feeling, I must say.

Heck, it could be someone a person speaks to rather regularly, but if hanging out ever gets brought up, then the conversation dies or there's an ending line of, "Well, we'll see what's going on. I'll call you when I find out." Of course, they don't call. It seems like a chore to move up the communication ladder as well. If two people are talking online and one suggests that they talk on the phone, then the other party treats it like a burden, "Gosh, well, you know. I'm talking to some other people right now." Only if they bring up the notion of talking on the phone, is that okay. Everything revolves around them and their time. In this scenario, we're the last resort. If they suggest we move the conversation to the phone, they know, in the back of their mind, that we'll say yes, from the fact that we've suggested it numerous other times, only to be rejected. When the two people actually chat over the telephone, an idea may come up about actually hanging out, but for one reason or another, those plans just don't follow through.

It reminds me of those old "Saved By the Bell" shows with Lisa Turtle and Screech Powers. Even though, deep down, I think Lisa liked Screech, she would outwardly express, "Well Screech, if you were the last guy on the face of the earth, then I'd give dating some thought." That's what it's like for last resorts. "Well, if there's no one else to hang out with and I really feel like getting out, then I guess I'll think about going with you somewhere."

Makes one feel good to feel like a burden or a last resort, doesn't it? If they're blind about it for one reason or another and don't feel like a last resort, then, that's good (for now). But eventually, they'll get the hint and at that point in time, it won't be feeling so pleasant. It'll be rather painful, actually.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"