Skip to main content

The Last Word

Some people are obsessed with getting the last word in a discussion, break-up or argument of some kind. For some reason, it makes them feel like they won the argument because of this last-word phenomenon. I'm sorry, but this last-word phenomenon doesn't prove that one finished stronger than the other.

If I get into a debate with someone regarding capital punishment and I relay a 5-10-minute speech, with numbers and sources to back up my position and they finish with, "I say, just fry them! Fry them all!" and then she hangs up, does that prove she got the best of me in that debate? No, absolutely not!

It doesn't matter who has the first word or the last word. What matters is who has the stronger points throughout the discussion or argument. It's the same way in sports. It doesn't matter if the Chicago Bears score on their last possession of the game if Green Bay scored the first 21 points of the game and dominated throughout. Just because the Bears had the last score doesn't take away from the fact that the Packers dominated and came away with the W.

In fact, those that insist on having the last word are usually on the short end of the duel. Just like in the football example above, if Chicago is burning timeouts, getting out of bounds and doing all they can to get in the end zone so they can have something to feel good about going into the following week's game, that's a direct indicator that they're on the losing end. If someone can shrug their shoulders and smile when the other has the last word, that's usually a good indicator that they came out on top. When the Packers allowed that final touchdown, sure, they might be a tad disappointed that they didn't shut the Bears out, but that pain will only be minor and temporary once they look at the scoreboard and see that they will come out victorious.

So, for those out there whom are obsessed with having the last word, watch yourself, because that doesn't necessarily mean that your point was stronger than the other's. If what you say is honest, potent and meaningful, then that will stand up regardless of who has the last word.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"