Skip to main content

Intentionally Misinterpreting Statements As Being Literal

I enjoy being a pain in the butt sometimes. I enjoy being creative, am a bit of a word geek and a bit of a smart aleck as well. Due to this, I detest clichés. First off, there isn’t any originality to re-using the same tired phrases over and over again. Also, I find that many of them don’t make an ounce of sense. So, I heartily enjoy intentionally misinterpreting such statements, in order to depict the ambiguity which resides in them and to showcase just how ridiculous the phrases are.

Following will be fictionalized dialogue between some unknown person and myself, where he/she/it will utter a common phrase or saying and I will respond accordingly.

Debra: “I’m as happy as a clam.”

Me: “The one you just ate?”


Anna: “Good morning!”

Me: “Are you trying to be funny?”


Albert: “There’s no ‘I’ in team!”

Me: “That is quite the observation. There isn’t a w, p, q or r either.”


Sherrie: “Come on, Craig. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.”

Me: “Don’t worry about it. I planned on staring at it for a while before speaking to it in Swedish.”


Jorge: “You know, man. We were just shooting the sh*t.”

Me: “Wouldn’t it be better to just flush the sh*t instead?”


Lucy: “As you know, the pen is mightier than the sword.”

Me: “Do you have a pen? I brought my sword. Let’s do this!”


Paul: “Let’s not beat around the bush, Craig.”

Me: “Suit yourself. I’ll be back in about a half hour.”


Jerry: “I don’t give a rat’s a*s what that guy says!”

Me: “He’ll probably be disappointed. I heard he is a collector of rats’ a*ses.”


Ernest: “I am not a happy camper right now.”

Me: “But we’re bowling…”


Tasha: “My ex wouldn’t know his a*s from his elbow!”

Me: “Can I see a picture?”


Becky: “Don’t give up, Craig! There are plenty of fish in the sea.”

Me: “No offense to them, but I’m not attracted to fish.”


Faith: “That guy really is barking up the wrong tree!”

Me: “I know. What does he think he is? A cocker spaniel? I hope he doesn’t fall.”


Lois: “Craig, you are the apple of my eye!”

Me: “Thanks and you’re the grapes of my nose.”


Alyssa: “I have to say this, Craig. You’re really starting to rub me the wrong way.”

Me: “I’m sorry about that. How about I make it up to you? Let’s go back to my place, so I can rub you the right way?”


Harry: “I’m just trying to think outside the box. What ideas do you have, smart one?”

Me: “One sec. I’ve got to get out of this da*n box. I’ll be right with you.”


Chuck: “Craig, the writing is on the wall.”

Me: “Yeah, I know. I was just in the bathroom. Do you know anyone named Jerome?”


Chandra: “It’s really raining cats and dogs out there!”

Me: “PETA is going to be pissed!”


Bob: “It’s colder than a witch’s tit out there!”

Me: “Really? I remember Lucinda’s were like ice cubes, the right one anyway.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...