Skip to main content

Nod and Smile

That's the routine anymore when playing the role of counselor. I used to give advice. I've tried going that route, but the longer I've played this role, the more I realize that most people don't want to receive advice or pointers about what they should do with their life or a certain situation. They just want to blow off some steam and vent about it to the counselor. After they've done that, then they can walk out of the office feeling more at ease with the problem, whatever it was, even though, by not altering anything, they're going to be walking right into that problem again and the cycle will continue.

If I go see a counselor and vent about a drinking problem a friend of mine has, sure, it may feel good to let it all out, but that's not going to help the drinking problem out any unless I or someone else goes and does something about it. It's not just going to cure itself, I'm sorry to say.

But unfortunately, that's all people want it seems. As long as someone gives them decent eye contact, nods, smiles, does everything to make it felt that the person is actually listening and paying attention, then that's all they want and think that they need.

Why is that? Is it the fact that most people don't want to believe that anything is wrong with them? That anything is their fault? I see this in relationships a lot. Once in a great while, one of the two parties involved may be to blame, but most of the time, as the saying goes, it takes two to tango.

Just like in a serious relationship between two people, the same thing holds true for the relationship between a counselor and the patient. Both parties have to do their part in order for true progress to be shown. If the counselor gives the best possible advice, but the patient is reluctant on following through with any of it, then it's obvious the problem is not going to be fixed anytime soon.

Maybe this is why we're relying so heavily on prescription drugs anymore. The two people are either not on the same wavelength or the patient isn't willing to follow through with anything that has been discussed. So, they go to Plan B and prescribe pills. Sometimes I think doctors jump the gun a bit too early when prescribing pills. They see a list of symptoms and go, "Ah, yes, that means you probably have this or that, so here you are. Take these and you'll be all better." Other times, I think frustration from the patient not doing anything to better his or her situation forces the doctor into a tight corner and they almost feel forced to prescribe something.

But with the counseling routine, all I can do anymore is nod and smile. You can only try to help a person so much. In the end, they have to be the ones making the decision and at that point, you just hope what you said to them lingers in their mind enough, so that they judge wisely when making that decision.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"