Skip to main content

A Walking, Talking Contradiction

Gotta love the folk who say one thing and do another. It's like they're blind in one eye and see 20/20 in the other. Yeah, I think we've all done this a time or two. But some are so consistent with it, that they are nothing more than a walking, talking contradiction. Pretty much everything they say, you can expect an action that contradicts those words.

I don't know, I think that when we give others advice, many times we state what we want to believe. Our conscience speaks and it can even be surprising in hindsight, when we look back at what we said, thinking, "Wow, I said that? Huh. I guess that is true, isn't it?" But it's different when we're taking part in what we spoke about to someone else. We tend to look at the situation differently, tend to be blinded by our inner biases toward a person, place or situation, and don't go with that same gut instinct we went with to advise another person.

But I would hope that somewhere down the line, we could become more consistent with our words and our actions. There will always be minor slip ups here and there, but I'd hope that those slip ups would occur less frequently as we grow and mature. But this just isn't the case for some.

Does our conscience give us an accurate perception or mold of who we are and what we believe, but when we go out into the very same predicaments we'd spoken about before, we lose track of or we don't fully believe that our conscience molded us accurately?

For example, I've heard people say I don't know how many times that they'd never date someone who they had to change much for or perhaps they told another not to date a particular person, because that person wanted them to change the entire complexion of who they were. Yet at the same time or perhaps in the near future, the one whom gave the advice or spoke those words, will drastically change themselves in order to please another. Someone might say that they are very much against disloyalty in anything, yet they had just asked someone to have an affair.

When people speak these honest words, do they feel the rules don't apply to them? It only applies to others? Is it a narcissistic perspective that they wrote the manual on what's right and wrong, so they don't have to follow the same guidelines as others?

It's very confusing, yet oddly humorous, when I hear and see these contradictions. Perhaps people are blind to their own hypocrisies and contradictions, but others outside the box certainly aren't and it can be very confusing for those outside the box looking in to witness these constant contradictions.

My advice is if you or anyone else bumps into a walking, talking contradiction, to actually confront them on the matter, so that hopefully they can start seeing it for themselves and make some changes to prevent the contradictions from occurring so frequently.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...