Skip to main content

A Walking, Talking Contradiction

Gotta love the folk who say one thing and do another. It's like they're blind in one eye and see 20/20 in the other. Yeah, I think we've all done this a time or two. But some are so consistent with it, that they are nothing more than a walking, talking contradiction. Pretty much everything they say, you can expect an action that contradicts those words.

I don't know, I think that when we give others advice, many times we state what we want to believe. Our conscience speaks and it can even be surprising in hindsight, when we look back at what we said, thinking, "Wow, I said that? Huh. I guess that is true, isn't it?" But it's different when we're taking part in what we spoke about to someone else. We tend to look at the situation differently, tend to be blinded by our inner biases toward a person, place or situation, and don't go with that same gut instinct we went with to advise another person.

But I would hope that somewhere down the line, we could become more consistent with our words and our actions. There will always be minor slip ups here and there, but I'd hope that those slip ups would occur less frequently as we grow and mature. But this just isn't the case for some.

Does our conscience give us an accurate perception or mold of who we are and what we believe, but when we go out into the very same predicaments we'd spoken about before, we lose track of or we don't fully believe that our conscience molded us accurately?

For example, I've heard people say I don't know how many times that they'd never date someone who they had to change much for or perhaps they told another not to date a particular person, because that person wanted them to change the entire complexion of who they were. Yet at the same time or perhaps in the near future, the one whom gave the advice or spoke those words, will drastically change themselves in order to please another. Someone might say that they are very much against disloyalty in anything, yet they had just asked someone to have an affair.

When people speak these honest words, do they feel the rules don't apply to them? It only applies to others? Is it a narcissistic perspective that they wrote the manual on what's right and wrong, so they don't have to follow the same guidelines as others?

It's very confusing, yet oddly humorous, when I hear and see these contradictions. Perhaps people are blind to their own hypocrisies and contradictions, but others outside the box certainly aren't and it can be very confusing for those outside the box looking in to witness these constant contradictions.

My advice is if you or anyone else bumps into a walking, talking contradiction, to actually confront them on the matter, so that hopefully they can start seeing it for themselves and make some changes to prevent the contradictions from occurring so frequently.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"