Skip to main content

They'd be fun to party with, wouldn't they? (former presidents, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton)

Before Barack Obama, our two previous presidents had a lot of jokes passed around about them and for good reason(s) - they'd make for pretty good party friends.

Just imagine what they'd offer the party. With Clinton, come on, you know he could bring some ladies along with him. He could also hook the gig up with some musicians, himself included (saxophone). Bill would find some doobies to pass around for people to smoke, but not inhale. I'm sure he could get some great deals on fast food as well. The ladies, the tunes, the weed and the grub.

Bush would be good for a comedy act. He could just give one of his speeches in front of a drunk and stoned audience and the end result would be a constant stream of hearty laughter. He'd also provide coke (Clapton sang about this kind), booze, pretzels and drunken security guards whom would keep everyone on their toes (watch out, they may think you're a bird!).

I can see Bill lighting a doobie and telling stories about his days in college. Whether the stories were fact or fiction, Billy Boy would make sure that his listeners enjoyed themselves.

I can see George W. putting a helmet on, some goggles, snow boots and playing truth or dare. He'd always choose dare and would do the darnedest things. These acts of utter stupidity would provide Billy with more stories to tell in the future and he would give those sober enough to video tape the dares to send them to America's Funniest Home Videos and win some money.

Bush and Clinton. Would I vote for them? One out of two. But if either or both asked me to go out on a Friday or Saturday night, I‘d respond with a resounding yes. That's what presidents are there for anyway, right? I can see the two performing a duet at the karaoke machine. I‘m thinking their song selection would be, "You Think My Tractor's Sexy."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"