Skip to main content

What Constitues Cheating?

A friend of mine got into a discussion about this very thing a while back. We agreed for the most part what "cheating" was, but she brought up a good point, that many have their different rules of what "cheating" is. That's true. I've heard of some couples who think so long as the other doesn't engage in sex with another, then they're not cheating. Some have some silly rules about if they're in different zip codes, then it's not cheating. Some go off the deep end and consider lying to be cheating or is that the deep end at all?

As usual, I will go to the helpful dictionary for some answers. How does it define cheating?
1. To deceive.
2. To mislead; fool.
3. To act dishonestly.
4. To be sexually unfaithful.

These are all pretty vague, except for the last definition. Alright, so I think most people can agree that engaging in sexual activities with someone other than their boyfriend, girlfriend, husband or wife is cheating.

But, then again, is there a line one must cross sexually with a third party in order for it to be considered sexually unfaithful? Is it cheating to kiss another person passionately? Well, whether one wants to consider it sexual or not, make-out sessions are definitely sexual and can often times lead to other things. So, yes, that falls under sexually unfaithful. Remember how we used to compare our sexual experiences to the game of baseball when we were younger? Anything that goes on between the bases can be considered sexually unfaithful.

But, what about the other three definitions? To deceive, to mislead/to fool and to act dishonestly. If one isn't necessarily being sexually unfaithful to their spouse, but has lied to them about someone or something in their life that will break the trust when it is later discovered, can that be considered cheating? What about certain types of flirting and other physical activities? Butt grabs, bumping 'n' grinding on the dance floor, making sexual gestures to another person. Does that count as cheating? Does the potential for cheating count as cheating? If a girlfriend gives a guy her phone number, with the intent to cheat, but it never works out, is that being unfaithful since she had the intention of being such? What about thinking of someone else when you're sexually involved with the person you're dating or married to? Is that cheating?

I think it depends on the two people involved. In all these circumstances, the barrier of trust can be broken when the second party finds out about it. But, most people don't think about any of these circumstances and consider it to be cheating. Cheating is seen by most as only something physical. Lying is a completely different arena. The potential for cheating doesn't count, because the act didn't actually happen. But, in all these predicaments, when the second party finds out, he or she may lose a great deal of trust in their partner, their relationship and it could very well be the beginning of the end for the two.

What does being sexually unfaithful entail? Covering it up with lies, until their committed partner gets suspicious and finds out or if the cheating party gets caught red-handed. The longer that it's been going on, the more it's going to hurt and the more difficult it's going to be to forgive and get over. Same thing goes with simple lying. When the other person finds out about the lies, it could be the beginning of the end for the two. The longer the lies have been told, the more damaging it's going to be to the relationship.

What do all these acts have in common? They're acts of dishonesty. Whether one lies verbally or cheats physically, they're acts of dishonesty that will most likely tear apart the relationship if and when they're discovered.

So, what is cheating? Cheating is the act of cheating another person of one's honesty and faithfulness. If one looks their partner in the eye and tells him that there are no other guys she's interested in and the next day, she flirts in a sexual manner with a male, gives him her number, and tells him to call her at such and such time, because her boyfriend won't be home, that right there is cheating the boyfriend of her honesty and faithfulness. If one has thoughts about doing things with another party, then they shouldn't be dating or married in the first place. Go out, do your thing, have fun, but don't hurt an individual by acting dishonestly (AKA cheating).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"