Skip to main content

Gun-rights march organizer compares self to Gandhi

Mohandas K. Gandhi was a a lot of things to a lot of people: A leader, a teacher, a philosopher, an inspiration, etc. It was through a practice Gandhi referred to as Satyagraha to which he and other Indian natives peacefully resisted British rule over their country. Ever since Gandhi was killed, the world has been searching for another Gandhi. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I think we've found him!

Meet Adam Kokesh. Adam is 31 years old, a political activist, and attempting to organize a gun-rights march protest in this nation's capital on Independence Day.

When asked how he and the other marchers should respond if they are blocked from crossing into Washington, D.C., Kokesh responded, "With Satyagraha."

Does this mean that like with Gandhi, violence is unacceptable according to Kokesh?

To that, he wrote, "Only if absolutely necessary in defense of life or limb."

On Adam's Facebook page regarding the coming event, he wrote that the march "will become violent if 'the government chooses to make it violent.'"

He also added this - "We will march with rifles loaded & slung across our backs to put the government on notice that we will not be intimidated & cower in submission to tyranny."

Insinuating that violence is necessary at times, all the while marching with a loaded rifle on his back? Yeah, that's what Gandhi would do all right. Perhaps Adam forgot rule #979 of Fight Club, which is, don't ever compare yourself to Gandhi, unless you wanna sound like a complete idiot.

Rumors has it that in his next interview, Kokesh is going to compare himself to Jesus and say, "I'm going to lead the march in this nation's capital on Independence Day and do what Christ would do - sacrifice myself for the sins of Washington, and shoot every motherf***er that tries to stop me, before ultimately falling to my inevitable death, and rising again three days later with a pair of AK-47s in my hands."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/activist-adam-kokesh-has-history-of-rabble-rousing-and-self-promotion/2013/05/13/95a0ddcc-b986-11e2-bd07-b6e0e6152528_story.html

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/05/15/2012951/kokesh-washington-gun-march/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...