Skip to main content

Republican strategist Brad Blakeman has a Princess-Bride moment regarding the term "statutory rape"

When subject turned to the FDA's (Food and Drug Administration) decision on lowering the age restriction for the morning-after pill from 17 to 15 on Fox News this morning, Republican strategist Brad Blakeman became quite upset. He became so upset that he had a Princess-Bride moment as I like to call them, where he spoke at length about a particular word, but obviously didn't know what the term meant.

In the before-mentioned movie, upon hearing the word "inconceivable" time and time again, character Inigo Montoya says, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

Brad Blakeman had a similar moment on Fox News this morning when he said the following:

"This makes no sense at all. You have to be 18 years old to buy a pack of cigarettes, and the president is also encouraging criminal behavior, because in most jurisdictions in American engaging in sexual intercourse at 14, 15 years old is statutory rape. The president is somehow saying in if you engage in that activity, criminal behavior, that is okay because the government is going to provide you the out for your bad decision making. [...]"

Obviously, Mr. Blakeman is not a legal scholar. According to the legal dictionary, statutory rape is defined as, "Sexual intercourse by an adult with a person below a statutorily designated age."

In other words, just because a person has sex at the age of 14 or 15, that does not mean he or she was the victim of statutory rape. Most times, such individuals have sex with people their own age and such cases would not constitute as statutory rape as Mr. Blakeman implied.

However, as sad as it is to say, women have been raped at the age of 14 or 15. Apparently, Mr. Blakeman doesn't feel such women should be afforded the option of the morning-after pill.

I'd love to see the GOP air an honest ad in the run-up to the next election, which says, "We don't believe in restrictions on guns. We do believe in restrictions on women's health. We're the GOP - the party of family values."

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/05/03/1959781/fox-news-teen-sex-criminal/

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Statutory+Rape

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...