Skip to main content

The Center for Immigration Studies recommends that the Republican Party focuses on winning more of the white vote

Know how, in light of their numerous defeats last November, the Republican Party has been trying to expand their voting base? Well, according to the "conservative, nonpartisan think tank" Center for Immigration Studies, there's really no need for the GOP to do that.

Based on reviewing newly released Census data, this "conservative, nonpartisan think tank" had this to say:

"As Republicans think about how they can expand their voting base, the new data suggest that one of their biggest problems in the last presidential election was that so many less-educated whites sat home. These voters, who have been hit hard by the recession, have traditionally supported Republicans. It seems likely that by supporting the Schumer-Rubio amnesty, GOP legislators would further alienate these voters."

The report went on to suggest that if Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney had won 3% more of the white vote, he would have won the popular vote, but that number would have had to increase to 23 percentage points among Latino voters if he were to win the popular vote.

What this report fails to see is that the percentage of white voters in this country is shrinking while the percentage of Latino voters is growing. By the year 2030, Latinos are expected to jump from 15% of registered voters to 25%, so says the Morrison Institute for Public Policy at Arizona State University. Also, even if Romney had won the popular vote in this past election, he still may have not been crowned president, for agree with it or not, the winner is decided via the electoral college. Romney could have won Florida (29), Virginia (13), and either Pennsylvania (20) or Ohio (18), and still come up short with either 266 or 268 electoral votes.

If the Republican Party had placed more emphasis on trimming the gap with Latino voters, they could have won Florida, Colorado, perhaps Nevada, and made New Mexico a bit more interesting. They could prevent the states of Texas and Arizona from turning purple in the coming election cycles, prevent Nevada, New Mexico, and Colorado from shifting to lean-blue states (solid-blue in New Mexico's case), and give themselves a better shot every four years of winning the highly coveted state of Florida. However, this would also require they reach out to more voters, tone down the hyperbolic rhetoric, become more moderate, and learn how to compromise. Unfortunately for them, that appears less likely than James Dobson and Pat Robertson starring a sequel to Brokeback Mountain.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/30/republicans-white-vote_n_3361687.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...