Skip to main content

Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe goes after Democratic colleagues for wanting to do something

Oklahoma Republican Senator Jim Inhofe has long been a global-warming denier. If it gets chilly on a single day in January, he'll shout to the world, "You see? Global warming is a hoax!"

In light of the tornado which recently swept through the state he represents and hearing some Democratic senators claiming that global warming could at least be partially to blame for a tornado of that magnitude, Inhofe, said this:

"The liberal media is trying to exploit a tragedy to advance and expand its own agenda. And, believe me, the victims all know this. We were being hit by tornadoes long before anyone talked about climate change, and even before it was called 'global cooling,' before it became 'global warming,' and then 'climate change.'"

Why is it that, after tragedies such as the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut or the before-mentioned tornado, it's such a no-no in many of these Congressional Republicans' minds to talk about them and try to pass legislation which could hopefully decrease the chance of them happening again?

After Newtown, many Democrats and Independents alike wanted to talk about passing gun-control legislation to decease the chance of a Newtown-shooting from happening again. However, many Congressional Republicans accused these Democrats of using the victims to further their own political agendas. They'd also say things like, "Now's not the time to talk about such legislation. We should have such a discussion, but now is not that time." My question is, when is the right time?

Also, while Congressional Republicans can point toward their Democratic colleagues as much as they want and accuse them of trying to further their own political agendas in times of crises, at least they're trying to do something. Here are the impressions the two parties have left me in the wake of the two before-mentioned tragedies:

Tragedy: Newtown, Connecticut shooting spree

Democrats: "Let's pass common sense gun laws so we can lessen the chance that another shooting like this one will happen again."

Republicans: "Let's not discuss this. Leave us alone and the problem will go away eventually."


Tragedy: Tornado in Moore, Oklahoma

Democrats: "There's a very real possibility that global warming played a factor in this devastating tornado. It's imperative that we try to work together to decrease the chance of another such tornado ravaging Oklahoma or any other state."

Republicans: "S**t happens. That's life. Deal with it. Let's go grab some burgers."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/28/jim-inhofe-climate-change-tornado_n_3345918.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"