Skip to main content

Rand Paul's crazy e-mail on behalf of the National Association on Gun Rights has been proven false by both Snopes.com and Politifact.com

Not long ago, Republican Kentucky Senator Rand Paul sent this e-mail on behalf of the National Association on Gun Rights:

"Dear fellow Patriot,

    Gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

    You see, only hours after re-election, Barack Obama immediately made a move for gun control…

    On November 7th, his administration gleefully voted at the UN for a renewed effort to pass the “Small Arms Treaty.”

    But after the tragedy in Newtown, Connecticut — and anti-gun hysteria in the national media reaching a fever pitch — there’s no doubt President Obama and his anti-gun pals believe the timing has never been better to ram through the U.N.’s global gun control crown jewel.

    I don’t know about you, but watching anti-American globalists plot against our Constitution makes me sick.

    This Spring, the United Nations went back into session to finalize their radical so-called “Small Arms Treaty.”

    With the treaty finalized, a full U.S. Senate ratification showdown could come any time President Obama chooses and there will be very little time to fight back.

    If we’re to succeed, we must fight back now.

    That’s why I’m helping lead the fight to defeat the UN “Small Arms Treaty” in the United States Senate.

    And it’s why I need your help today.

    Will you join me by taking a public stand against the UN “Small Arms Treaty” and sign the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey right away?

    Ultimately, UN bureaucrats will stop at nothing to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.

    So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept many of their schemes under wraps.

    But looking at previous attempts by the UN to pass global gun control, you and I can get a good idea of what’s likely in the works.

    You can bet the UN is working to FORCE the U.S. to implement every single one of these anti-gun policies:***  Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

    ***  CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

    ***  BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

    ***  Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

    I’m sure I don’t have to tell you this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose.

    Ever since its founding 65 years ago, the United Nations has been hell-bent on bringing the United States to its knees.

    To the petty dictators and one-world socialists who control the UN, the United States of America isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand designs for the globe.

    These anti-gun globalists know that as long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide power they crave.

    And the UN’s apologists also know the most effective way to finally strip you and me of ALL our freedoms would be to DESTROY our gun rights.

    That’s why I was so excited to see the National Association for Gun Rights leading the fight to stop the UN “Small Arms Treaty!”

    Will you join them by going on record AGAINST global gun control and sign the Official Firearms Sovereignty Survey today?

    The truth is there’s no time to waste.

    You and I have to be prepared for this fight to move FAST.

    The fact is the last thing the gun-grabbers at the UN and in Washington, D.C. want is for you and me to have time to mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical agenda.

    They’ve made that mistake before, and we’ve made them pay, defeating EVERY attempt to ram the UN Small Arms Treaty into law since the mid-1990s.

    But now time may not be on our side.

    And worse… the UN Small Arms Treaty is no longer the only UN scheme threatening our gun rights.

    More and more of the UN’s radical agenda is slipping through covertly, under the cover of domestic legislation.

    Not long ago, Obama told Sarah Brady from the anti-gun Brady Campaign, “I just want you to know that we are working on [gun control].  We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

    In fact, Hillary Clinton’s State Department recently bragged that Project Gunrunner and Operation Fast and Furious are implementations of the UN’s anti-gun agenda!

    And I’d place a wager that Obama’s M1 Rifle Re-importation Ban was also the UN’s agenda dutifully executed by his administration.

    Anti-gun UN policy that NEVER received a single vote in the United States Congress!

    The UN met recently to pass a final version of the “Small Arms Treaty” to be sent for ratification by the Senate.

    So if you and I are going to defeat them, we have to turn the heat up on Washington now before it’s too late!

    1.  Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land?

    2.  Do you believe any attempt by the United Nations to subvert or supersede your Constitutional rights must be opposed?

    If you said “Yes!” to these questions, please sign the survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you.

    But I hope you’ll do more than just sign your survey today.

    With your help, the National Association for Gun Rights will continue to turn up the heat on targeted Senators who are working to implement the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”

    Direct mail.  Phones.  E-mail.  Blogs.  Guest editorials.  Press conferences.  Hard-hitting internet, newspaper, radio and even TV ads if funding permits.  The whole nine yards.

    Of course, a program of this scale is only possible if the National Association for Gun Rights can raise the money.

    But that’s not easy, and we may not have much time.

    In fact, if gun owners are going to defeat the UN’s schemes, pro-gun Americans like you and me have to get involved NOW!

    So please put yourself on record AGAINST the UN Gun Ban by signing NAGR’s Firearms Sovereignty Survey.

    But along with your survey, please agree to make a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35.

    And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference.

    Thank you in advance for your time and money devoted to defending our Second Amendment rights.

    For Freedom,

    Rand Paul
    United States Senator
    P.S. Only hours after re-election Barack Obama immediately made a move for gun control…

    On November 7th, his administration gleefully voted at the UN for a renewed effort to pass the “Small Arms Treaty.”

    What’s worse, the UN met in March to pass the final version of the treaty that will be sent to the Senate for ratification.

    If we’re going to defeat the UN “Small Arms Treaty,” gun owners have to turn the heat up now before it’s too late!

    Please return your Firearms Sovereignty Survey and put yourself squarely on the record AGAINST the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”

    And if you can, please make a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights of $250, $150, $100 or even just $35 right away!

    And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, it will make a difference."

Sadly enough, this 1,214-word e-mail is nothing but a bunch of malarkey. The claims Paul makes in this e-mail have already been fact-checked by Snopes.com and Politifact.com. Snopes found the claims to be "false," while Politifact gave them a "pants-on-fire" grade for being so inaccurate. In other words, Senator Paul was just trying to frighten people into sending money to the National Association for Gun Rights, and sadly enough, I'm sure it worked.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/11/rand-paul-obama-is-working-with-anti-american-globalists-plotting-against-our-constitution/

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2012/may/17/craig-james/craig-james-says-barack-obama-and-hillary-clinton-/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"