Skip to main content

Kudos to Ndamukong Suh for supporting Team Jack, but...

Jack Hoffman is a 7-year old boy from Nebraska who has unfortunately been battling brain cancer the past couple of years. After two go-rounds of brain surgery, approximately 95% of the tumor was removed, but the other 5% has been declared inoperable and has altered in size since the second operation.

The youngster has made a few headlines in recent weeks. In Nebraska's spring game, he was handed the ball on a play and ran for a 69-yard touchdown, before being picked up and cheered on by the team, the fans in the the crowd, and people all across this country. If you've yet to witness this heart-warming and tear-inducing event, it can be viewed at this link - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/07/jack-hoffman-touchdown-nebraska-spring-cancer_n_3033583.html

President Obama then invited he, his family, and former Cornhuskers tailback Rex Burkhead to visit him at the Oval Office this past week. That touching photograph and story can be seen and read here - http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57582162/obama-meets-jack-hoffman-young-cancer-patient-who-won-hearts-in-nebraska-football-game/

Then just today, I saw a picture of former Nebraska Cornhuskers and current Detroit Lions defensive lineman Ndamukong Suh posing for a picture where he's wearing a support Team Jack (in reference to Hoffman), which can be seen here - http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=364516263650355&set=a.130257303742920.18420.130253380409979&type=1&theater

Look at the Suh picture yet? Notice anything unusual about it? I give props to Burkhead, Suh, and any other celebrity whom raises awareness and donations for the Team Jack cause. However, why in the world does Suh's name have to be above and in larger font than "Team Jack"? Doesn't that seem a little egotistical and unnecessary? The most important thing is Jack Hoffman and his battle with brain cancer - raising awareness for both his case and others like his, and raising money to provide little Jack and people like him with a better chance of overcoming their health struggles. No matter how big Suh is in the literal sense or how big he thinks he is in the figurative one, he's not bigger, not more important than Jack Hoffman's cancer. No one is. No matter how big his cancer is, though, hopefully young Jack, with many people's help, can overcome this and live a very long and happy life.

To learn more about the Jack Hoffman story and get involved with "Team Jack," please visit the following site - http://www.curesearch.org/legacy.aspx?id=10201

Comments

  1. The shirt was released by the Team Jack Foundation, not Suh himself. He just signed off on it. So it's very unlikely Suh or his people had anything to do with the design. They probably just featured his name because it was a good selling point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment. That's quite possible, I suppose (Suh and/or his people didn't have anything to do with the design). Either way, though, I still don't really care for the design. It's a definite positive for celebrities such as Suh, Rex Burkhead, etc. to get involved with this cause and bring much needed attention to it. However, I personally think it would make a difference just for people to see these celebrities wearing "Support Team Jack" shirts and the like, without their names being plastered on them (the shirts) as well. I'd purchase a shirt just to showcase my support for the Team Jack cause, not because the shirt says Ndamukong Suh (or another celebrity) supports it. Given the fact the young boy is from Nebraska, though, perhaps featuring such Cornhuskers' names on the shirts is a good selling point. ::shrugs::

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"