Skip to main content

There's no way around it - some people are just jerks

I've always been someone who, no matter how difficult it may be to find at times, always tried to find the good in people. No matter how little I have in common with a person, I'm typically able to find one common interest or experience we can discuss with one another. This is how I've always been. No matter how different two people may seem to be, chances are there's at least one common interest or experience they have which they can talk and laugh about for hours on end.

However, while I stand by everything I wrote in the previous paragraph, there are some people whom are just a*sholes.

I know one such person (at least). Just a couple days ago, I tweeted information on how to provide aid for victims of the Oklahoma tornadoes. There was nothing political about the post. It simply provided a link with contact information for different organizations, like the American Red Cross, whom would provide aid to the victims of the tornadoes.

Yesterday, I received a response to this tweet from the before-mentioned individuals, which said, "Coming soon: Gov't mandates homeowner's insurance disaster relief."

Really? After a devastating tornado left many without homes or people they loved, he has the nerve to try and make a political point about government mandates - specifically comparing the matter to Obamacare?

Some people, like him, have no concept for the feelings of others. All they care about are themselves. Nobody else matters. They weren't directly impacted by the storm, so why should they care? It's pure selfishness and greed 101. If they had been directly impacted by the storm, their reaction would likely be different, and would be seeking the same kind of help they're disregarding for others at this current juncture.

Then what made me almost burst out loud laughing today was when this same person posted something about how the only way to find love was through Jesus. Let's think about this for a minute here. Here's a person who doesn't seem to believe in providing aid for people in need - people who have lost their homes or loved ones. Yet, this same person preaches that the only way to find love is through Jesus - a man who Christians believe sacrificed himself to save us from our own sins. In other words, an extremely selfish man is saying we should find love through a selfless man. Sadly, this isn't an aberration. I have observed many such individuals going about things in the same manner. They'll disregard a whole group (or groups) of people in a negative manner and then preach about the love of Jesus. It's as if they think by saying they love, believe in, or worship Jesus, that it gives them a free pass on doing whatever they want, no matter how cruel or evil the act is. I've got news for them - believing in Jesus (or any religious figure) doesn't make someone a good person. It cracks me up when I hear a person imply that the only way to be good is to love and worship a religious figure such as Jesus, or contend that a person is good because he or she loves and worships Jesus. "He's such a good man. He's a firm God-believer, you know." Yes, and he also cheated on his wife with many women, got into several fights for no apparent reason, and was an alcoholic. But, yeah, go on believing he's a good Christian man.

While I'm not a follower of any religion, perhaps these very people of which I speak, if they actually want to be Christian, should read the Bible and pattern their lives in a more selfless manner like Jesus did, as opposed to just using his name and image as a crutch. Of course, that would go against their habits, desires, and genuine moral philosophy, so there's probably less chance for that than there is of me winning the lottery. If these people actually asked the question, "Would Would Jesus Do?," I'm sure they'd be oddly surprised to learn it would be the direct opposite of what they've been doing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"