Skip to main content

Study reveals high heels don't cause bunions, but...

I just read a strange article regarding a study. Framingham Foot Study just released results from a study which showcased that high heels don't cause bunions.

Here's how this information is played out in the article:

"...Scientists have produced study after study proving what women already know: Heels hurt your feet. A lot. Specifically, shoes with heels strain your calf muscles, permanently shorten your tendons, damage your posture and twist your ankles.

But we've got some consolation for all your heel devotees: High heels do NOT give you bunions!"

The article closes by saying this:

"...But of all the harm heels inflict on women's bodies -- hurting our muscles, throwing our posture out of whack, making us fall off a sidewalk or two -- they aren't to blame for those bunions..."

Perhaps the author was writing sarcastically, however, if a die-hard high heel enthusiast read about the study's findings, she would likely scream with jubilation, ignore all the potential negative effects of heels and instead focus on this one non-negative finding, and think to herself, "I knew it. I knew it all along. Now I can start wearing heels to the rave, the ice-skating rink, on the trampoline, and while bowling! This is going to be so much fun!"

This would be like finding one non-negative in a study on the effects of smoking and an addicted smoker focusing on that.

Study: "While smoking can increase the risk of: Coronary thrombosis, cerebral thrombosis, dementia, high blood pressure, kidney failure, mouth cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, cancer of the oesophagus, cancer of the kidneys, cancer of the pancreas, cervical cancer, COPD, hypertension, fertility problems, macular degeneration, cataracts, gum and teeth stains, periodontal disease, ulcers, erectile dysfunction, and worsen asthma, it is now known to not effect extinct animals."

Smoker: "Woo-hoo! Did you hear that, guys? We can smoke even more now! What were they trying to stop us for in the first place? Idiots!"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/high-heels-bunions_n_3307502.html

http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/health_advice/facts/smokehealth.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"