Skip to main content

Study reveals high heels don't cause bunions, but...

I just read a strange article regarding a study. Framingham Foot Study just released results from a study which showcased that high heels don't cause bunions.

Here's how this information is played out in the article:

"...Scientists have produced study after study proving what women already know: Heels hurt your feet. A lot. Specifically, shoes with heels strain your calf muscles, permanently shorten your tendons, damage your posture and twist your ankles.

But we've got some consolation for all your heel devotees: High heels do NOT give you bunions!"

The article closes by saying this:

"...But of all the harm heels inflict on women's bodies -- hurting our muscles, throwing our posture out of whack, making us fall off a sidewalk or two -- they aren't to blame for those bunions..."

Perhaps the author was writing sarcastically, however, if a die-hard high heel enthusiast read about the study's findings, she would likely scream with jubilation, ignore all the potential negative effects of heels and instead focus on this one non-negative finding, and think to herself, "I knew it. I knew it all along. Now I can start wearing heels to the rave, the ice-skating rink, on the trampoline, and while bowling! This is going to be so much fun!"

This would be like finding one non-negative in a study on the effects of smoking and an addicted smoker focusing on that.

Study: "While smoking can increase the risk of: Coronary thrombosis, cerebral thrombosis, dementia, high blood pressure, kidney failure, mouth cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, cancer of the oesophagus, cancer of the kidneys, cancer of the pancreas, cervical cancer, COPD, hypertension, fertility problems, macular degeneration, cataracts, gum and teeth stains, periodontal disease, ulcers, erectile dysfunction, and worsen asthma, it is now known to not effect extinct animals."

Smoker: "Woo-hoo! Did you hear that, guys? We can smoke even more now! What were they trying to stop us for in the first place? Idiots!"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/high-heels-bunions_n_3307502.html

http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/health_advice/facts/smokehealth.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...