Skip to main content

The House tries repealing Obamacare for the 37th time

If at first you don't succeed, try 35 more times without success, and then try again. That has been the Republican mindset in the House of Representatives regarding Obamacare.

Yesterday, the Republican-controlled House voted to repeal Obamacare for the 37th time. Considering Democrats control the Senate by a 55-45 margin and the president is a Democrat who signed the bill into law, there's less chance for the bill to be repealed prior to 2016 than there is of a marijuana smoker saying he felt a sudden burst of energy after smoking a bong while listening to the Grateful Dead. 

So why on earth did Republicans feel the need to vote for a 37th repeal of the healthcare reform law?

House Speaker John Boehner answered that question as follows:

"We've got 70 new members who have not had the opportunity to vote on the president's health care law. Frankly, they've been asking for an opportunity to vote on it, and we're going to give it to them."

Well, isn't that sweet? In the meantime, Boehner and the Republican House are wasting their time and an estimated total of $53.8 million of tax payers' money on these 37 votes.

Do Republican members of the House seriously believe that the Democratic-controlled Senate is going to follow their lead and vote to repeal the law as well, and on top of that, believe that President Obama is going to finalize the matter by repealing Obamacare?

Also, with regard to the 70 new members of the House to whom Boehner was referring in his statement, do aspiring Republican politicians all across the country go through this following thought process when running their campaigns?

"I really want to make a difference in this country. I want to be a positive influence on the younger generation. I want to make my friends and family proud. How do I go about that, though? Creating jobs? No. I'd have a job, so why would I need to create others? Come on - think! What can I do? Oh, I've got it! I can vote against Obamacare and try to take health insurance away from millions! That would be the most positive, helpful, difference-making move of all!"

What if these Republican House members held a similar philosophy in other areas of their lives?

Situation: Calling someone (and leaving messages)

GOP House member: "Hey again. It's me, again... I think this is the 37th time I've called today. Gosh, I miss you. I know we just met at the bar the other night, but I can't stop thinking about you, and..."

Woman picks up the phone: "LEAVE ME ALONE!!!" ::click::


Situation: Ordering food at a Kentucky Fried Chicken

GOP House member: "Yes, I'd like the filet mignon, please, and I'd like that medium-rare. Thanks."

KFC employee: "I'm sorry, sir. We don't have that on the menu. Please look at the menu again and order off that."

GOP House member: "What? You don't know what you're talking about. I want a filet mignon and I'm going to get a filet mignon. I'd like that medium-rare."

KFC employee: "Sir, this is a Kentucky Friend Chicken. We don't offer steak here."

GOP House member: "I don't care what you're called! Now, I'm starting to lose my patience! Give me a d*mn filet mignon, medium-rare!"

KFC employee: "Would you like me to get my manager?"

GOP House member: "Yes, I would."

KFC manager: "Is there a problem, sir?"

GOP House member: "Look, I came here for a filet mignon. I asked what's-his-name for a filet mignon several times and he won't give me a filet mignon. I came here for a filet mignon! I'm going to get a filet mignon!"

KFC manager: "I'm sorry, sir, but that's not going to happen. We are a restaurant that specializes in chicken, hence the name. We don't serve steak here. Might I suggest you try the Outback Steakhouse across the street. From what I hear, they do serve steak there..."

GOP House member: "I can sit here all day if you want. I've got nothing better to do. I'll ask you 37 times for a filet mignon if I have to!"

KFC manager: "Sir, you're going to have to leave. I'll call the cops unless you leave in the next ten seconds."

GOP House member: "Whatever. I'll just give Pizza Hut a try. I'm sure they serve steak over there."

KFC manager: "You're not going to..."

GOP House member: "What?"

KFC manager: "Oh, nothing. Best of luck over there."


Situation: Proposing

GOP House member: "You know I love you, right?"


Woman: "Yes, I know..."

GOP House member: "What I'm trying to say is, will you marry me?"

Woman: "NO! For the 37th time, no! You're not supposed to even be talking to me right now! I placed that restraining order against you after the 6th time you asked me to marry you! How in the world could you possibly think that after rejecting you 36 times, I'd magically say yes the 37th time? What, are you stupid or something?"

GOP House member: "No, just in love. Love blinds us all."

Woman: "I'll blind you with Mace if you ever get near me again! Goodbye!"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/16/house-obamacare_n_3288283.html

http://miami.cbslocal.com/2013/05/16/obamacare-repeal-votes-costs-tens-of-millions/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"