Skip to main content

Sexist Fox and Friends

Yesterday on the Fox News show Fox and Friends, hosts Steve Doocy (not to be confused with douchey), Brian Kilmeade, and Gretchen Carlson spent a full 13 minutes talking about a person in a video clip who took close to a half-hour to parallel park.

Doocy then said, "It took a full 30 minutes for the driver to squeeze into the parallel spot. So who was behind the wheel? Well, it turns out, it was a woman."

Douchey and Kilmeade then challenged Carlson and meteorologist Maria Molina to a battle of the sexes to see which pair could parallel park better than the other.

Fox News never ceases to amaze me at how it degrades women. Would the bit have been fine if Sir Douchey and company simply talked and laughed about the video clip without drawing attention to the fact the driver was a woman? Yes. However, Douchey had to go and do just that by saying, "...So who was behind the wheel? Well, it turns out, it was a woman."

I then read comments following the article from Fox defenders, complaining about the PC (political correctness) police, that liberals don't have a sense of humor, that people can't joke around about anything anymore, and to lighten up.

I'm sorry, but sexism isn't funny. The segment could have been entertaining if the writers and hosts went about things in a different manner, but they chose to spend that time mocking the driver, not because the driver was bad necessarily, but because the driver was a woman and fed into some seemingly ancient stereotypes.

There's quite a stark difference between the following two scenarios:

Scenario #1 - simply poking fun at the driver

Doocy: "Wow, would you look at that? How long is this going to take? Does anyone have a stopwatch?"

Kilmeade: "I know, right? This is worse than the time you tried parallel parking after smoking a few bowls. Remember that?"

Doocy: "Allegedly..."

Kilmeade: "Oh, there's nothing alleged about it. I have video evidence, right here as a matter of fact..."

Doocy: "Oh, please don't... So, where are we at? 25 minutes?"

Kilmeade: "I have 30 minutes. We could have watched 60 Minutes in that time-frame!"

Doocy: "I know, right?"

Kilmeade: "Oh, would you look at that? The parking mission is finally completed! This calls for a celebration!"

Doocy: "Cheers!"


Scenario #2 - poking fun at the driver's gender

Doocy: "Wow, would you look at that? How long is this going to take? Does anyone have a stopwatch?"

Kilmeade: "I know, right? This is almost as bad as you!"

Doocy: "Very funny. Did you get a look at the driver?"

Kilmeade: "Yup. It's a woman. Go figure, right?"

Doocy: "Women are such lousy drivers. It's a fact. I remember reading it somewhere one time."

Kilmeade: "They're always on their phones, doing their make-up, touching themselves. Just watch the road and drive, women!"

Doocy: "What is there to be talking about while driving anyway? Who has friends anymore, really?"

Kilmeade: "This show does!"

Doocy: "Ah-ha! That's a good one! But, back to women... I think it should be put into law that women can only drive taxis."

Kilmeade: "You mean ride in taxis, right?"

Doocy: "Oh yeah, that's right. I'm serious, though. I mean, just look at this woman trying to parallel park. How long has it been? 25 minutes?"

Kilmeade: "I have her down for 30 minutes, and yeah, I'm right with you - it's a scientific fact that women are bad drivers and shouldn't be allowed on the road, unless they're just walking and really hot."

Doocy: "Agreed. Oh, would you look at this? She parked! It only took her about 30 minutes! That's pretty good for a woman!"

Kilmeade: "Yeah, it is! I say just stay in the kitchen, ladies, and let us do the driving!"

Doocy: "Amen."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/01/fox-friends-parking-battle-sexes_n_3195295.html?utm_hp_ref=media

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"