Skip to main content

Big Ten Update

As we've reached at least the midway point for all twelve Big Ten teams, I think it's safe to say that the top doesn't appear to be as strong as was anticipated at the season's outset, the bottom doesn't appear to be as weak and there's still some uncertainty regarding whether certain teams are more fitting in the top or bottom half of the conference.

The Ohio State/Indiana game on Saturday night was very reflective of this. Ohio State is the lone unbeaten in conference and the lone Big Ten team ranked in the top 20. The only other school ranked in the top 25 is 4-2 Michigan at #23. Indiana, meanwhile, is 2-4, 0-3 in conference play and appears to be on the verge of vying for one of the bottom spots in the conference when the season's all said and done. On Saturday night, the 7-0 and 7th-ranked Ohio State Buckeyes defeated the 2-4 Indiana Hoosiers by the final count of 52-49. For the time being, the Buckeyes are definitely the best team in the conference and if it weren't for Illinois, Indiana may be seen as the worst team in the Big Ten at the moment. After Saturday night's nail-biting shoot-out, I think most honest people would say that Ohio State definitely doesn't look like a top 10-caliber team and Indiana doesn't appear to be as bad as their record would indicate.

Iowa looked awful during their rather soft non-conference schedule, yet following a 19-16 double overtime win in East Lansing against Michigan State on Saturday, they're now 2-0 in conference and 4-2 overall. Michigan State, meanwhile, dropped to 1-2 in conference and 4-3 overall. They, along with Purdue, have to be seen as the most disappointing team in the Big Ten to this point in the season. Speaking of Purdue, after starting the year 3-1, they've gotten throttled the past couple weeks by Michigan and Wisconsin by the combined score of 82-27 (average of 41.0 - 13.5). Wisconsin has played anything but pretty football to this point in the season, but after that dominating performance against Purdue in West Lafayette on Saturday, they're 2-1 in Big Ten play and 5-2 overall. Northwestern improved to 6-1 with a 21-13 win over 4-2 Minnesota. Lastly, Michigan pummeled Illinois 45-0 and sadly, it wasn't even that close. Nebraska and Penn State both had bye weeks.

Looking ahead, there are some big games in conference play next week. Illinois is the only team to have a bye and Indiana will play Navy on the road out of conference. Purdue goes to Columbus to take on unbeaten Ohio State. Minnesota takes on Wisconsin in Madison. Nebraska comes off their bye to face Northwestern on the road. Penn State does likewise against the Iowa Hawkeyes. Lastly, Michigan State travels to Ann Arbor to take on in-state rival Michigan.

Ohio State, Wisconsin and Michigan should be home favorites, but can't fall asleep on Purdue, Minnesota or Michigan State. If they do that, they can count on losses. On paper, the Nebraska/Northwestern and Penn State/Iowa games appear to be the most evenly matched

Looking even further ahead, the Big Ten better hope that Wisconsin continues to play well or that Purdue suddenly gets hot, because when one excludes Ohio State and Penn State due to their both being bowl ineligible at season's end, the other four Leaders Division teams (Wisconsin, Purdue, Indiana and Illinois) are a combined 2-9 in conference play and 12-14 overall. Ouch!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"