I heard from the special guest on ESPN's Pardon the Interruption the other day that "everybody" loves the new playoff format, where there are two Wild Card teams at season's end who play in a one-game playoff. However, I know this statement is inaccurate, for I do not feel this way. Just like with rewarding the league winner of the All-Star Game with home-field advantage in the World Series was a bad idea in my opinion, this is as well.
I'm fine with changes being made to the playoff-format in Major League Baseball. I was in favor of adding a Wild Card team initially for a best-of-five series. I'd be fine with the addition of a second Wild Card team in each league, but not in the current format. As far as I see it, there were only four teams in each league that made the playoffs this year: New York, Detroit, Oakland and Baltimore from the American League and Washington, Cincinnati, San Francisco and St. Louis from the National League. Texas and Atlanta played in a one game tie-breaker to determine who would make the playoffs and unfortunately for them, they both lost.
I'm sorry, but a single game "series" in baseball can't be seen as the playoffs. This is something we'd see in college basketball or football, but not Major League Baseball. Now, it worked out fairly well in the American League this year, as the two Wild Cards teams - Baltimore and Texas - finished the regular season with identical records, and the one-game playoff could have ultimately been viewed as a tie-breaker. However, that wasn't the case in the National League, where Atlanta finished the season six games ahead of St. Louis. Before this year, Atlanta would have clinched the one Wild Card spot almost a week before the season ended, which would have vaulted them into a best-of-five National League Division Series. But instead, the team was almost penalized by being forced to play in a one-game playoff against a squad of which they finished six games ahead in a 162-game regular season.
If "everyone" is at least semi-pleased with this new format, I suggest altering it slightly and make the two Wild Card teams play in a best-of-three series. It won't take away any of the added excitement across the country of the two-team Wild Card race in both leagues and it won't penalize the Wild Card who finished with a better regular-season record. I think it's a fair compromise. Also, if it were altered in this manner, teams like Texas and Atlanta wouldn't be traveling home after a one-game playoff, thinking, "Wait...that's it? What just happened? Is the season over? I thought this was the playoffs!"
I'm fine with changes being made to the playoff-format in Major League Baseball. I was in favor of adding a Wild Card team initially for a best-of-five series. I'd be fine with the addition of a second Wild Card team in each league, but not in the current format. As far as I see it, there were only four teams in each league that made the playoffs this year: New York, Detroit, Oakland and Baltimore from the American League and Washington, Cincinnati, San Francisco and St. Louis from the National League. Texas and Atlanta played in a one game tie-breaker to determine who would make the playoffs and unfortunately for them, they both lost.
I'm sorry, but a single game "series" in baseball can't be seen as the playoffs. This is something we'd see in college basketball or football, but not Major League Baseball. Now, it worked out fairly well in the American League this year, as the two Wild Cards teams - Baltimore and Texas - finished the regular season with identical records, and the one-game playoff could have ultimately been viewed as a tie-breaker. However, that wasn't the case in the National League, where Atlanta finished the season six games ahead of St. Louis. Before this year, Atlanta would have clinched the one Wild Card spot almost a week before the season ended, which would have vaulted them into a best-of-five National League Division Series. But instead, the team was almost penalized by being forced to play in a one-game playoff against a squad of which they finished six games ahead in a 162-game regular season.
If "everyone" is at least semi-pleased with this new format, I suggest altering it slightly and make the two Wild Card teams play in a best-of-three series. It won't take away any of the added excitement across the country of the two-team Wild Card race in both leagues and it won't penalize the Wild Card who finished with a better regular-season record. I think it's a fair compromise. Also, if it were altered in this manner, teams like Texas and Atlanta wouldn't be traveling home after a one-game playoff, thinking, "Wait...that's it? What just happened? Is the season over? I thought this was the playoffs!"
Comments
Post a Comment