Skip to main content

Breaking from The Drudge Report - Obama was the only one to criticize the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina!

Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson had a simultaneous orgasm on Fox News last night when reporting on a video which showcased then Senator Obama criticizing the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina. As Obama is currently the president, it's safe to say this video is over four years old - in fact, it's over five years old, as it took place in June of 2007. The full transcript has been available for multiple years.

The far-right is claiming that Obama's speech was divisive and racially-charged, as he said the following:


“Down in New Orleans, where they still have not rebuilt twenty months later. There’s a law, federal law — when you get reconstruction money from the federal government — called the Stafford Act. And basically it says, when you get federal money, you gotta give a ten percent match. The local government’s gotta come up with ten percent. Every ten dollars the federal government comes up with, local government’s gotta give a dollar. Now here’s the thing, when 9-11 happened in New York City, they waived the Stafford Act — said, ‘This is too serious a problem. We can’t expect New York City to rebuild on its own. Forget that dollar you gotta put in. Well, here’s ten dollars.’ And that was the right thing to do. When Hurricane Andrew struck in Florida, people said, ‘Look at this devastation. We don’t expect you to come up with y’own money, here. Here’s the money to rebuild. We’re not gonna wait for you to scratch it together — because you’re part of the American family.’ What’s happening down in New Orleans? Where’s your dollar? Where’s your Stafford Act money? Makes no sense! Tells me that somehow, the people down in New Orleans they don’t care about as much!”

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, then President Bush said the following during a speech (no, this video wasn't showcased on Fox News last night, as it would have resulted in Hannity and Carlson attaining blue balls as opposed to an orgasm):

"That poverty has roots in a history of racial discrimination, which cut off generations from the opportunity of America. We have a duty to confront this poverty with bold action. So let us restore all that we have cherished from yesterday and let us rise above the legacy of inequality. When the streets are rebuilt, there should be many new businesses, including minority-owned businesses, along those streets."

It's not as if Obama was the only person to criticize the federal government's reaction to Hurricane Katrina. In a Marist poll taken during that time, it showed that 66% of registered voters didn't approve of the federal government's response to Katrina, including 64% of Independents and even 42% of Republicans.

I find it to be quite remarkable at the level of desperation exuded by the Romney team and Republicans in general in releasing and attempting to make a big deal out of this five-year old video. What has the Romney team attempted to stray away from almost more than anything? George W. Bush. The guy wasn't even present at the Republican National Convention (outside of a short cameo on video). What is the one thing the former president probably wishes he had handled differently? Hurricane Katrina. With the releasing of this video, both George W. Bush and Hurricane Katrina will be front and center in political dialogue - the last  two things Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan want Independent and undecided voters to be thinking about before casting their ballots on election day.


http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/10/02/946441/in-new-bombshell-video-obama-criticizes-federal-response-to-hurricane-katrina/

http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/obama-speech-jeremiah-wright-new-orleans/#ixzz28GJ50OHU


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/16/national/nationalspecial/16bush-text.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print

http://maristpoll.marist.edu/tag/hurricane-katrina/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"