Skip to main content

Paul Ryan apparently believes in magic

As he stated in his interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday, Republican Vice Presidential candidate and former Mr. Universe in the eyes of himself - Paul Ryan - continued to adamantly declare that the numbers in Mitt Romney's tax plan add up.

He said, "...The numbers add up; we have shown that."

He then attempted to elaborate, saying: "...by subjecting higher income earners' income to more taxation, remove tax shelters, lower deductions for higher income people, more of their income is subject to taxation so you can lower tax rates for everybody across the board and shelter the middle class from any kind of tax increase. There is obviously enough fiscal space to lower tax rates to 20 percent, keep these middle-class preferences. We have show how that works."

They have? That'd be news to me and the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, which showcased via analysis that "the Romney plan would have to raise taxes on the middle class (by eliminating their exemptions and deductions) in order to be deficit neutral..."

Granted, Ryan has told us time and time again that the numbers add up, however that's quite different than showing us that they do. Based on this explanation and others Ryan has given on a host of issues, I think it's now safe to say that he believes in magic. By telling and not showing us how the numbers add up, Ryan has found a way to do both, as through telling us, he has been showing us. Paul Ryan would make for a great teacher on, well, just about anything.

Professor Ryan (math): "Today's class, we'll be focusing our attention on algebra. So do it! Do the algebra! Find X!"

Student: "But how?"

Ryan: "I showed you how. Do the problem! Do it! Find X!"

Student: "Which problem?"

Ryan: "That's for you to decide. While you're all finding X, I'm going to find my ex who I just realized is working here and throw her my bone, if you know what I mean."

Yeah, the really sad thing about this is the fact Paul Ryan has been known as the more detailed of the two (the other being Romney, of course). If he's the more detailed, has Romney gone mute?

I imagine when he proposed to his wife, Paul Ryan looked at her and just asked, "So, will you?" and after 15 minutes of repeating himself and finally presenting her the ring, she finally knew what in the hell he was talking about and asked for some Advil - telling him she'd sleep on it (the question - not the Advil). For as "detailed" as Ryan is, I think I've found the perfect job for him if this Vice President thing doesn't work out - write horoscopes.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/02/paul-ryan-mitt-romney-tax-plan_n_1932167.html

http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2012/08/01-tax-reform-brown-gale-looney

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"