Skip to main content

Breathing exercises for liberals and Democrats

In light of President Obama's debate last Wednesday night and a recent Pew Research poll which showed Romney ahead by 4% among "likely voters" over the president, I can't tell you how many times I've heard or read liberals/Democrats in a full-blown panic. Relax... 

According to the latest Gallup poll, the president has a 53% approval rating. While he's down by 2 points among "likely voters," he's up by 3 among registered ones. He's also seen improvements in RAND and YouGov polls, which seem to showcase him re-establishing a 4-5 point lead over the Republican nominee. Numbers-geek Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com is still giving the president a 70% chance of winning the election and even noted that the "likely" voter model is often times unreliable and more times than not, the actual election numbers run more in line with the registered voter polls than the likely voter ones. 

Also, we can't forget that while many people may disagree with the electoral college (I'm one of these people), it's currently how we reward someone the presidency on election day. National polls may receive a great number of headlines, but what it really comes down to are state polls and one candidate attaining 270 electoral votes on November 6th. 

With that in mind, let's look at how the race is shaping up right now. When I last looked at the electoral map a couple weeks ago or so, I saw Obama's guaranteed victories to be in the following states:

1) Washington (12 electoral votes - 12 total)
2) Oregon (7 - 19)
3) California (55 - 74)
4) Hawaii (4 - 78)
5) New Mexico (5 - 83)
6) Minnesota (10 - 93)
7) Illinois (20 - 113)
8) Maine (4 - 117)
9) Vermont (3 - 120)
10) New York (29 - 149)
11) Massachusetts (11 - 160)
12) Connecticut (7 - 167)
13) Rhode Island (4 - 171)
14) New Jersey (14 - 185)
15) Delaware (3 - 188)
16) Maryland (10 - 198)
17) Washington D.C. (3 - 201)

From that point, I've altered things a bit. I no longer see the first two in this next list as guarantees, but as very strong leans and even added a third:

18) Michigan (16 - 217)
19) Pennsylvania (20 - 237)
20) New Hampshire (4 - 241)

The next five states I'd categorize as leans:

21) Wisconsin (10 - 251)
22) Ohio (18 - 269)

23) Iowa (6 - 275)
24) Colorado (9 - 284)
25) Nevada (6 - 290)


So, at this time, the President has 17 states locked up (including D.C.) for a total of 201 electoral votes. He has a total of 20 nearly locked up for a total of 241 electoral votes. There are yet five others leaning his direction for a total of 290 electoral votes. While the president has been in pretty good standing in Ohio and I'm close to moving both that and Wisconsin to the near-lock list, Obama hypothetically could lose Ohio, Florida, Virginia and North Carolina and still come out on top with 272 electoral votes.

I believe there are now three true toss-up states that could go either way come election day:

26) Virginia (13 - 303)
27) Florida (29 - 332)
28) North Carolina (15 - 347)

Lastly, while it may be a long shot for the president to win any of these remaining states, he's not completely out of the running yet:

Indiana (11)
Georgia (16)
Missouri (10)
Montana (3)
Arizona (11)

So try to relax some liberals/Democrats. It doesn't matter how the public largely perceived last week's debate and the recently released Pew Research poll is of no importance either. Romney has a great deal of ground to make up all across the electoral map. While the race is far from over, I'd much rather be in President Obama's situation right now than Mr. Romney's. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"