Skip to main content

Is it just me or does Romney come across as a major...

Especially in the television era, it has seemed that a presidential candidate's personality has been of at least as much, if not greater importance than his or her policy ideas. If we look at the eventual winners of these presidential elections, there has appeared to be a fairly noticeable trend when it comes to the winners being more personable than their opponents.

If we just look at the most recent elections, Jimmy Carter was an extremely nice and likable guy. Ronald Reagan was incredibly personable. George H.W. Bush may not have possessed the charisma of Reagan, but was still more likable than his Democratic opponent Michael Dukakis. Bill Clinton, which some ladies can attest to, was more personable than H.W. Bush. Likewise, he was more likable than Bob Dole. Even though I didn't care for the guy's policies, George W. Bush came across as more likable than either Al Gore or John Kerry. Finally, in 2008, Barack Obama was definitely the more attractive candidate than John McCain. 

That brings us to this year's election, where Obama takes on Mitt Romney. As far as the sense test(s) go, who wins? Obama, without question. This is one reason I'd be quite surprised if Romney won on November 6th. In fact, there's something else Romney possesses, which would make his victory over Obama in 2.5 weeks a bigger surprise to me than if any of those previously-mentioned losers of elections had defeated their opponent and here is why - Mitt Romney comes across as a complete a**hole. 

Jimmy Carter may have come across as too nice when faced against Ronald Reagan. Michael Dukakis came across as too weak to some in comparison to George H.W. Bush. Bush came across as too dull compared to Clinton, as did Dole. Gore was viewed as boring when compared to George W. Bush. John Kerry came across as too serious and lawyerly when he faced Bush in 2004. John McCain had an old man's grumpy vibe to him. He may have been pleasant from the hours of noon to five, but not before or after then. None of these men came across as jerks, except for perhaps McCain in the early morning or mid-evening. Mitt Romney, on the other hand, might as well have "JERK" tattooed to his forehead and might as well change his name from Mitt Romney to Jerk Romney, because that's how he's viewed by many and I'm guessing a good 84.3% of people would just shrug their shoulders at the change and mumble, "That wasn't there/his name before? Could have fooled me..."

Most times when Romney smiles, it feels forced and comes across as a creepy makeup-less clown in a  horror film. When he laughs, it sounds masked, like in something one would find in a store devoted to Halloween. When he tells a joke, it's so dark and unfunny, I wonder if he's about to say a eulogy for Charles Manson. When he just looks straight into the camera, I get this unnerving feeling that his head is about to explode at any second. When he talks, I feel like I'm about to get yelled at by a football coach who is about to overdose on steroids and just got finished listening to a death metal band by the name of "I Hate You All!" Yeah, I think if this whole president deal doesn't work out for Mr. Romney, he has a future in writing books - the first of which will be called, "A Dummy's Guide to Being a Major A**hole".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...