Skip to main content

Debating with the brainwashed

Of course, in light of the presidential debate being aired live last night, many people felt the need to let their thoughts on it be known via Facebook statuses. A very good friend of mine let her thoughts be known, which I agreed with, but which a friend of her's didn't care for too much.

Toward the end of his two early posts, he said, "Obamacare is what scares me."

In response, I asked the question, "What about Obamacare scares you exactly?"

He responded with, "The list is too long to go through. I don't have the time to explain the bill to you."

Yes, he sounded exactly like Paul Ryan right there when responding to Fox News' Chris Wallace when being asked about the Romney/Ryan tax plan. "It would take too much time to explain!" Sure it would...

So I then called the guy out on his nonsense and pointed out that I didn't appreciate his condescending tone. He then said he wasn't going to get into this "childish" debate with me.

I finally said, "If you didn't want to run the risk of getting into a 'childish' debate, why did you let your political thoughts be known? Didn't you realize you'd run the chance of someone inquiring as to why you felt the way you said you did and if you did happen to provide reasons, of being fact-checked?"

When someone goes about a political "debate" like this guy did, the fact is they don't know what they're talking about. He claims he doesn't have enough time to go through all the reasons he's frightened of Obamacare? Nonsense. He had time to make 5+ comments, including stating that he's scared of Obamacare. If he had all that time on his hands to make multiple comments like he did, I find it incredibly difficult to believe he didn't have time to provide even just one reason Obamacare makes him tremble in fear.  Chances are he doesn't know why Obamacare scares him. The guy has decided he's Republican, voting for Romney, has been told to be frightened of Obamacare and that's about as far as it goes. He just didn't have the time (supposedly) of Googling Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Ted Nugent or Jesus' comments on Obamacare, so he attempted to try and come across as intelligent and tough by being condescending, when he wound up just making himself appear to be ignorant.

People can try all they'd like to come across as intelligent and tough when making their political opinions be known, but if when they're asked to elaborate on why they feel the way they do, they provide nothing of substance and instead attempt to cast the other person in a weak and ignorant light, the only one they're truly casting in such a light is themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"