Skip to main content

Big Ten Update

Things became more interesting in the Legends division after this weekend's games and more awful in the Leaders division. With Michigan's 23-9 loss to Nebraska, the Wolverines are in a first-place tie in the Legends division at 3-1, with Nebraska now holding the tie-breaker advantage. Northwestern and Iowa each have two losses in-conference following the Wildcats' beatdown of the Hawkeyes. Michigan State and Minnesota are each two games back with three losses a piece. All six teams in the Legends division could potentially make bowl games.

The Leaders division is like the Legend division's farm team. Its two leaders - Ohio State and Penn State - are bowl ineligible due to NCAA violations. The other four teams in the division are a combined 4-13 in conference play. The only one of those four to win this weekend was Indiana, when they defeated another Leaders division team - Illinois. Wisconsin will still likely play in the Big Ten Championship Game, yet lost to struggling Michigan State in overtime this weekend. Purdue got pummeled by Minnesota, who was 0-3 in conference play going into the game. Illinois fell to Indiana to match Purdue's 0-4 record in Big Ten play. It is possible that only one team from this division - Wisconsin - will play in a post-season game.

There aren't many big in-conference games next weekend, but games where the favorite will need to stay focused or else they could wind up sleepwalking to a loss and wondering what in the world just transpired. Michigan, coming off a disappointing loss to Nebraska and wondering if starting quarterback Denard Robinson will return after being hurt in that game, will face Minnesota on the road, who is one win away from becoming bowl eligible. If Michigan isn't focused, they'll fall to 5-4. Iowa travels to Bloomington to take on Indiana. If the Hoosiers find a way to win at home, both teams will wind up being 2-3 in conference and 4-5 overall. Nebraska travels to East Lansing to play Michigan State. Both teams are coming off big wins - Nebraska defeating Michigan and Michigan State upending Wisconsin in overtime. Nebraska can't suffer a hangover or else they could travel back to Lincoln looking up at Michigan in the standings. The conference's best and worst teams square off, as unbeaten Ohio State will play host to 2-6 Illinois. Lastly, Penn State goes on the road to play Purdue. Both clubs are coming off disappointing losses, with the Nittany Lions suffering their first conference loss of the year in falling to Ohio State by a couple scores and Purdue (Purdon't more like) got stomped yet again to fall to 0-4 in Big Ten play. If Purdue doesn't win this game, they'll need to win their final three in order to become bowl eligible.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/standings

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/scoreboard?confId=5&seasonYear=2012&seasonType=2&weekNumber=10

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"