Skip to main content

Illinois Republican Representative Joe Walsh makes another asinine claim on abortion

Republicans already in or currently running for Congress certainly have made some interesting statements with regard to abortion in recent months. Missouri Senatorial candidate Todd Akin basically stated that he feels women's vaginas have magical powers and are able to block off sperm from a rapist to prevent pregnancy, negating any need for an abortion in the cases of rape.

In Thursday night's debate with Democrat Tammy Duckworth, Illinois Representative Joe Walsh said the following with regard to abortion if the mother's health was in jeopardy:

"With modern technology and science, you can't find one instance... There's no such exception as life of the mother. And as far as health of the mother, same thing, with advances in science and technology, health of the mother has become a tool for abortions anytime under any reason."

Again, here is another man who is extremely ignorant when it comes to women's health and abortions. In the United States, there are 15.1 pregnancy-related deaths for every 100,000 live births.

"You can't find one instance..." That's 15.1 per ever 100,000. Unfortunately, that results in many instances, Mr. Walsh.

If one wants to find a single instance where Representative Walsh comes across like an idiot, this would be it. However, call it a crazy hunch, but I have a feeling there are many other instances of the like along with this one.

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/10/19/1046391/more-junk-science-gop-congressman-says-abortion-is-never-necessary-to-save-a-womans-life/

Comments

  1. Ok, here's the thing: no woman asks to be raped. And when she is raped, the thing going through her mind is "oh my God, am I going to become pregnant?" Certainly no woman wants to give birth to the child of her rapist. So who is this man to tell the ladies that abortion is wrong? The day he grows a vagina and female reproductive system, then he'll understand. Until that day comes, he needs to keep his lowball opinions to himself

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, exactly. Whenever a guy gives a strong opinion with regard to women's rights, in claiming they shouldn't have a particular right and that this is the morally right thing to do, my first reaction always is, "Are you a woman? Have you ever been a woman? Do you have any idea what it's like to be a woman?" I didn't think so... ...and like you said, until that moment, "he needs to keep his low-ball opinions to himself."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"