Skip to main content

Why it's difficult to have civilized political discourse anymore

While many say it's a no-no to ever discuss politics with another person, I think it would be healthy for more people to do so. The problem is that it's getting ever more difficult to civilly discuss such matters with people of differing viewpoints because many people get their "facts" from different sources, these sources usually aren't consistently reliable, and "facts" often times get blurred with opinions.

Sadly, it's gotten to the point where, when I debunked a conspiracy theory of another individual's, he countered that with, "Well, when you think about it, there really isn't such a thing as facts." In other words, "facts" are what we make of them. So long as we believe something to be true, it is, because it can't be proven with 100% certain that it's inaccurate.

A big problem is that many liberals and Democrats tend to get their news from sources like: MSNBC, The Daily Show, internet memes, and many conservatives and Republicans tend to get their news from: Fox News, Rush Limbaugh (and other talk radio), internet memes and chain emails, etc. All of these sources have a political bent to them, and intertwine opinion with fact.

A study was just released which showed that while MSNBC was 90% accurate with regard to climate science, Fox News was just 28% accurate. So, when a regular watcher of the two cable networks get into a discussion regarding that issue, the conversation likely goes something like this:

MSNBC viewer: "Look at the numbers! Climate change is real!"

Fox News viewer: "Whatever! I've heard otherwise. What news channel do you watch?"

MSNBC viewer: "MSNBC"

Fox News viewer: "You see? That's just liberal garbage right there! They're just trying to spread a liberal agenda! That's hogwash!"

MSNBC viewer: "Well, what channel do you watch?"

Fox News viewer: "Fox News"

MSNBC viewer: "...and you actually believe that crap? Look at the studies. Here - I'll show you..." ::fact-checks to find that climate change is real::

Fox News viewer: "Fox said it was baloney, so whatever."


Now, while I believe that MSNBC is more consistently accurate with their reports than Fox News, they still mix opinion with fact to slant the channel to the left, and anymore, it's becoming next to impossible to engage in civilized political discourse with a person of an opposing viewpoint, because not only do the two people disagree on the issue at hand, they disagree on what sources are reliable, and what constitutes actual facts. The fact it seems as if a growing number of people mistake opinion for fact gives me a migraine just thinking about it...
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...
Post a Comment
Read more

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html
Post a Comment
Read more

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...
Post a Comment
Read more