Skip to main content

"Joni Ernst, would you please define 'fact' for me? That's 'fact' - 'F - A - C - T' - 'fact.'"

Before she was elected as Senator of Iowa, Joni Ernst got into an interesting discussion with Charles Pierce from Esquire magazine.

After a speech where Ms. Ernst referred to President Obama as "apathetic," the following exchanged between the reporter and newly elected Senator:

Pierce asked what she meant about the president being "apathetic"

Ernst: "He is just standing back and letting things happen, he is reactive rather than proactive. With Ebola, we see he's very hands-off. He's not leading. He's not leading."

Pierce: "What should he have done about Ebola? One person in America has Ebola."

Ernst: "OK, you're the press, you're giving me your opinion."

Pierce: "But that's not an opinion. It's a fact. Only one person in America has Ebola."

Ernst: "But he is the leader. What he can do is make sure that all of those agencies are coordinating together and make sure that he is sharing that information with the American people, that he cares about their safety."

Pierce: "So he doesn't care about the people with the disease?"

Ernst: "I don't know that he does, he hasn't demonstrated that... I'm sorry. I'm done. Anybody else?"


Ernst, like many other members of the far-right, appears to have a problem distinguishing opinions from facts. Given her response to Charles Pierce's question, expect Senator Ernst to utter the following at some point during her first term in office:

- "You seriously think Des Moines is the capital of Iowa? Well, that's like your opinion, man."

- "I'm not going to get into this discussion with you! It's simply your opinion that 7 x 7 = 49."

- "Rene Descartes said, 'I think therefore I am'? Whatever. That's just your opinion."

- "For anyone that thinks my name is Joni Ernst, that is entirely their opinion!"

- "If you don't think I'm very smart, that's probably a fact, but whatever."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/11/gop-candidate-joni-ernst-to-charles-pierces-factual-ebola-question-thats-your-opinion/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...