Recently, I read the following letter-to-the-editor in the Columbus Dispatch and felt the need to respond. The letter was entitled, "Young people have lost their sense of values." Here it is:
"In his Thursday letter 'Young people more flexible on gay marriage,' Ben Meacham said, 'The younger generation is adapting to an ever-changing society.'
Well, either it is adapting to an ever-changing society, or it is changing society itself.
I recall that back in the 1940s and 1950s (I am 81), abortion, euthanasia, cohabiting before marriage, children born out of wedlock and — gasp! — same-sex marriage were simply unheard of. The problem, as I see it, is the members of the current generation, because many, if not most, are completely comfortable with these developments.
Does anyone really think our society is better off by virtue of allowing 54 million abortions to have taken place?
It’s really not a question of society evolving or traditions changing. We’ve lost a good part of our moral values and, at the risk of being old-fashioned, I must ask: Whatever happened to sin?
JACK WOLOCK
Columbus"
First off, even if young people are "changing society itself," as Mr. Wolock implies, what he appears to forget is that change in society isn't always a bad thing. When African-Americans fought for voting rights, was this a bad change for society? When women fought for similar rights, was this a bad change for society? When mixed-race couples fought for equal marriage rights, was this a bad change for society? So, now that homosexuals are fighting for equal marriage rights, is that a bad change for society? Maybe the problem here isn't the younger generation "changing society itself," so much as it's people like Mr. Wolock whom refuse to adapt to change due to their prejudices.
Secondly, the writer attempts to throw everything at the wall and hope something sticks by listing all the changes he's seen in his lifetime or may potentially see down the road which he feels to be immoral, yet the list is so random and full of false equivalence, I have a great deal of trouble not picturing this man outside his home, yelling, "Get off my lawn! Wait, where am I?" So, abortion is to euthanasia is to cohabiting before marriage is to having children born out of wedlock is to same-sex marriage, eh? ...and the 1940s and 1950s were the good old days because Mr. Wolock didn't hear about such things occurring? Could this partly be due to there being less media outlets and no Internet? No matter what Mr. Wolock would like to believe, homosexuals were around during those two decades, couples lived together before being wed, and children were born out of wedlock. Also, the Civil Rights Act had yet to be signed. After those two decades, women and minorities continued seeing non-discrimination laws passed, as well as rape laws, equal pay laws, etc. So, yes, the 1940s and 1950s were the good old days, for heterosexual Christian white men. Shame on everyone else for wanting to "change society" by obtaining equal rights. Isn't that right, Mr. Wolock?
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2014/07/14/young-people-have-lost-their-sense-of-values.html
"In his Thursday letter 'Young people more flexible on gay marriage,' Ben Meacham said, 'The younger generation is adapting to an ever-changing society.'
Well, either it is adapting to an ever-changing society, or it is changing society itself.
I recall that back in the 1940s and 1950s (I am 81), abortion, euthanasia, cohabiting before marriage, children born out of wedlock and — gasp! — same-sex marriage were simply unheard of. The problem, as I see it, is the members of the current generation, because many, if not most, are completely comfortable with these developments.
Does anyone really think our society is better off by virtue of allowing 54 million abortions to have taken place?
It’s really not a question of society evolving or traditions changing. We’ve lost a good part of our moral values and, at the risk of being old-fashioned, I must ask: Whatever happened to sin?
JACK WOLOCK
Columbus"
First off, even if young people are "changing society itself," as Mr. Wolock implies, what he appears to forget is that change in society isn't always a bad thing. When African-Americans fought for voting rights, was this a bad change for society? When women fought for similar rights, was this a bad change for society? When mixed-race couples fought for equal marriage rights, was this a bad change for society? So, now that homosexuals are fighting for equal marriage rights, is that a bad change for society? Maybe the problem here isn't the younger generation "changing society itself," so much as it's people like Mr. Wolock whom refuse to adapt to change due to their prejudices.
Secondly, the writer attempts to throw everything at the wall and hope something sticks by listing all the changes he's seen in his lifetime or may potentially see down the road which he feels to be immoral, yet the list is so random and full of false equivalence, I have a great deal of trouble not picturing this man outside his home, yelling, "Get off my lawn! Wait, where am I?" So, abortion is to euthanasia is to cohabiting before marriage is to having children born out of wedlock is to same-sex marriage, eh? ...and the 1940s and 1950s were the good old days because Mr. Wolock didn't hear about such things occurring? Could this partly be due to there being less media outlets and no Internet? No matter what Mr. Wolock would like to believe, homosexuals were around during those two decades, couples lived together before being wed, and children were born out of wedlock. Also, the Civil Rights Act had yet to be signed. After those two decades, women and minorities continued seeing non-discrimination laws passed, as well as rape laws, equal pay laws, etc. So, yes, the 1940s and 1950s were the good old days, for heterosexual Christian white men. Shame on everyone else for wanting to "change society" by obtaining equal rights. Isn't that right, Mr. Wolock?
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2014/07/14/young-people-have-lost-their-sense-of-values.html
Comments
Post a Comment