Skip to main content

Liberal purists are hurting the Democratic Party

I don't officially affiliate myself with either political party. If I were to label myself, I'd say I'm a liberal/progressive Independent. However, given the limited options on election day, I tend to vote Democratic. In saying all of that, I think liberal purists are hurting the Democratic Party.

As a liberal who tends to vote Democrat, I think fellow progressives need to step back for a moment, take a deep breath, and come to the realization that we don't want to follow a similar path as Republicans have over the past couple of decades. Over the past 20+ years, with the help of Fox News, talk radio, and now the Internet, the Republican Party has been increasingly trending right. Progressive Republicans have gone the way of the dodo bird; moderate Republicans have been placed on the endangered species list; and the GOP has seemingly reached the point where, if an aspiring Congressional member of the party doesn't keep in lockstep with the party's leaders on each and every issue, they and conservative media outlets will tell their followers not to vote for this person on election day. Now, 20 years later, the GOP has become about as diverse in thought as The Bachelor is diverse in body types. This has closed the party off to demographics such as: Women, Latinos, blacks, Muslims, LGBTs, teachers, scientists, fact-checkers, etc. If the Democratic Party wants to remain relevant for the long haul, they can't follow that same route and I'm fearful they're on the verge of doing so.

We all have our beliefs, our ideal vision of America, but we have to remain realistic and do everything in our power to help bring this nation closer to our ideal vision of it. While that will happen when we hold steadfast in certain areas, it will only happen if we compromise in others. We can't expect to continually make progress if we exclude people from our party for holding a single different viewpoint than us. What we should be doing is the direct opposite. Instead of telling a person he or she isn't a Democrat because they're "pro-life," for example, what we should be doing is telling them, "While I disagree with your opinion on reproductive rights, we have a big tent over here at the Democratic Party, welcome you with open arms, and hope we can come to some form of compromise with regard to our difference in opinion on the matter, to where we can decrease the number of abortions in this country, yet maintain a woman's right to choose what to do with her body when she becomes impregnated."

While I admit to being fairly liberal, I know a majority of people in this country identify as moderate, and it will do absolutely no good for myself or other liberals like me to continually exclude moderates from the Democratic Party due to a single difference of opinion. If we do that, the party isn't going to last very long...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...