Skip to main content

Why does it seem most people can't completely own up to their mistakes?

While I'm by no means a fan of confrontation, especially in relationships (dating, friendships, or otherwise), it is essential at times to either check the status of a relationship or to move it forward in one manner or another. However, I've noticed two common problems with these confrontations: 1) Some people refuse to engage in such discussions, and 2) When confronted on an issue, many refuse to completely own up to their mistakes.

While I understand the mindset of those in group 1, as I've come to learn, the longer people ignore problems in a relationship, the more likely it is that said problems will come back to bite them somewhere down the line. As the saying goes, the first step to solving a problem is admitting one exists. If one doesn't admit this problem, how will he or she know one is present, and how will they then tackle and defeat said problem? It would be strange to hear someone say they enjoy confrontation, but whether or not we enjoy it, it's necessary to keep a relationship progressing.

Of the two groups of people I listed, I've actually had much more experience with those in the second. While I can understand that it may be difficult to take full responsibility for a problem at times, I rarely witness people completely own up to these mistakes. If confronted about a mistake they made, they'll often times resort to the tit-for-tat strategy and showcase false equivalence - that or apologize, but follow it up with comments which make the apology appear to not exactly be sincere.

An example of the tit-for-tat strategy would be this:

Wife: "This is the second time I caught you kissing another woman! How can I ever trust you?"

Husband: "Well, you're not exactly an angel yourself. Remember that time you winked at that guy at the restaurant?"

Wife: "I had something in my eye. It was a natural reaction."

Husband: "Sure, sure. I had something in my eyes too, which is why I kissed those women - I mistook them for you." :: wink wink ::

Wife: "That's not the same thing! Ugh!"


The tit-for-tat strategy is a defense mechanism for many. They may take a comment about a mistake they made as an insult to their character, and they almost instinctually react by pointing out the other person isn't perfect either. While this may relieve them of some guilt initially, it tends to cause more problems in the end.

The less-than-sincere-apology strategy goes something like this:

Female: "I'm really, really sorry that I don't want to date you, but I mean, you should have known better than to have gotten feelings for me. I even told you fairly early that I wasn't looking to date anyone right now. So, if you think about it, this is pretty much all your fault. Again, though, I'm really sorry."

Male: "Wait - what? You said you really liked me, you hadn't felt this way in a long time, and that you were even smitten with me..."

Female: "Yeah - so? I'm sorry, but you should have known I didn't want to date."

Male: "But I met you at a dating site, and you said you were looking for a serious relationship."

Female: "Get over it, buddy. If you're not cool with putting your feelings to the side and just being friends, we should probably stop talking."

Male: "But the name of the site was IWantToGetMarriedAlready.com."

Female: "Gosh, you're annoying! I said I was sorry, okay? It's your fault anyway! I've been honest from the beginning!"

Male: "But you've contradicted yourself several times..."

Female: "Whatever."


Why is it so difficult for someone, when being confronted about a mistake they made, to just say, "You know what? You're right, I'm sorry, and I'll do everything in my power to make certain that doesn't happen again"? We all make mistakes, and the only way we'll improve upon these mistakes is by admitting they happened and making the necessary adjustments to prevent them from occurring again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

Book Ranking Update

Three of my four books are now in the top 100,000, including one of the new two: "The Kind-Hearted Smart Aleck (censored version)" (2011) - 149,246 "The Kind-Hearted Smarta*s (uncensored version)" (2011) - 96,347 "Seasons Come, People Grow: A Poetic Journey" (2006) - 57,336 "The Serious Scale of Sarcasm: More Balanced Than a Drunken High-Heeled Clown On a Tight Rope" (2007) - 39,666 Let's keep those numbers going in the right direction, meaning down, I suppose! (http://www.lulu.com or can be purchased elsewhere)