Skip to main content

Politifact's Ten Most Reviewed Politicians

Celebrating their 10-year anniversary, Pulitzer Prize-winning fact-checking site, Politifact.com, just released a list and breakdown of their ten most reviewed politicians. Here is said list and breakdown, starting with the politician who has been reviewed the most and moving in descending order:

Barack Obama: 598 Total, 288 True/Mostly True (48.2%), 150 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (25.1%), Net +23.1%

Donald Trump: 436 Total, 72 True/Mostly True (16.5%), 301 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (69.0%), Net -52.5%

Hillary Clinton 294 Total, 148 True/Mostly True (50.3%), 77 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (26.2%), Net +24.1%

Mitt Romney: 206 Total, 63 True/Mostly True (30.6%), 85 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (41.3%), Net -10.7%

John McCain: 184 Total, 74 True/Mostly True (40.2%), 79 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (42.9%), Net -2.7%

Scott Walker: 180 Total, 65 True/Mostly True (36.1%), 81 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (45.0%), Net -8.9%

Rick Perry: 173 Total, 50 True/Mostly True (28.9%), 79 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (45.7%), Net -16.8%

Marco Rubio: 152 Total, 55 True/Mostly True (36.2%), 65 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (42.8%), Net -6.6%

Rick Scott: 148 Total, 50 True/Mostly True (33.8%), 60 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (40.5%), Net -6.7%

Ted Cruz: 119 Total, 26 True/Mostly True (21.8%), 77 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (64.7%), Net -42.9%

Here's how these ten politicians rank alongside one another when it comes to their net honesty scores:

1. Hillary Clinton: +24.1%
2. Barack Obama: +23.1%
3. John McCain: -2.7%
4. Marco Rubio: -6.6%
5. Rick Scott: -6.7%
6. Scott Walker: -8.9%
7. Mitt Romney: -10.7%
8. Rick Perry: -16.8%
9. Ted Cruz: -42.9%
10. Donald Trump: -52.5%

Here's how the before-mentioned numbers would look if we broke things down by party:

Democrats (2): 892 Total, 436 True/Mostly True (48.9%), 227 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (25.4%), Net +23.5%

Republicans (8): 1,598 Total, 455 True/Mostly True (28.5%), 827 Mostly False/False/Pants on Fire (51.8%), Net -23.3%

1. Democrats: +23.5%
2. Republicans: -23.3%

Of course, conservative media outlets are claiming these numbers prove Politifact is liberally-biased. No, the numbers simply show that facts tend to have a liberal bias...

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/barack-obama/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/mitt-romney/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/scott-walker/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/john-mccain/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rick-perry/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/marco-rubio/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rick-scott/

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/ted-cruz/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...
Post a Comment
Read more