Skip to main content

Happy Hollimasukkah!

It seems that on an annual basis, around this time of year, I hear people show anger or annoyance at those who express seasons greeting differently than them.

Emerald Fuddyduddy: "Happy Holidays!"

Russell Zoloft: "No, it's Merry Christmas! What are you, a fricking atheist?!?"

Fuddyduddy: "Seasons Greetings!"

Zoloft: "Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas! You can't spell 'Christ' without 'Christmas,' or something like that!"

I'm sorry, but who cares? Fox News likes to clamor on about an alleged "War on Christmas" because an increasing number of people are telling each other "Happy Holidays" as opposed to "Merry Christmas," but that's a bigger myth than Santa Claus being healthy enough to travel the world on December 25th of every year without facing any repercussions.

Again, who cares? It's not like when someone says "Happy Holidays," they're really saying, "Hey! Hey! Hey! You wanna know what I think about Christmas? F*ck you! F*ck you! F*ck you too! F*ck all of you!" No, they're simply saying, "I hope you have a safe and happy holiday season coming up with your friends, family, and loved ones." When someone says "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Hannukah" or "Happy Festivus," they're essentially expressing the same thing. Why must some of us take these greetings so personally? If, after I get married, 55% of people greet me by saying, "Congratulations!" while a handful of others say something along the lines of, "Way to go!" should I take the latter set of comments personally and feel offended by them? No, of course not. That'd be silly and would likely ruin a nice buzz if I focused too much on that.

I find it ironically humorous that many who complain about Christmas being stripped from us are the ones placing a damper on the holiday. Laugh, relax, enjoy time with your friends and family, and stop focusing on how others greet one another. Trust me, it'll make for a much happier holiday season for you and those around you. So, on that note, Happy Hollimasukkah!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...