Skip to main content

What's more likely?

So, I read a Columbus-Dispatch letter-to-the-editor today which revolved around gay rights and how it sickened her it was becoming normal for people to accept homosexuality. There have been 36+ comments made in response to the article. A majority of posters disagreed with the author. There were a few, however, who brought religion into the discussion and made claims (with no sources to back them up) that homosexuality cannot be in any way genetic, that it's an abomination in the eyes of God and that the increase of gay rights was slowly destroying the moral compass of our society. After I provided links to studies which showed that there's an increasing belief by scientists that homosexuality is at least partially due to genetics, one individual in particular dismissed the studies, continuing to clamor that there's been no proof of the orientation being due to genetics.

I just had to laugh. Now, I believe in freedom of religion. I'm not a religious person, but a person should have the freedom to believe whatever he or she desires. However, I wanted to ask that poster something like this, "With all due respect, sir, what is less likely? ...that an invisible man created the world, and that his son (kind of, but not really) was born from the womb of a virgin and due to his perfection, was sent to die on a cross as a sacrifice to all of mankind, so that we may live eternally so long as we worship him OR that a minority of people are born slightly differently than most, in that they're sexually attracted to the same gender?" If he said the former was more likely than the latter, I'd probably give myself such a vicious facepalm, it'd result in a concussion.

Comments

  1. Thanks again for your comment. I'm both fascinated with yet quite flustered by the politically-outspoken churches in this country. Abortion and gay marriage are never specifically mentioned in The Bible. The passages referring to homosexuality were commonly seen as strong points to it being an abomination. However, that tone has shifted some in recent years, as the sin of Sodom isn't homosexuality in a growing number of scholars' minds, but inhospitality. So, it really befuddles me why some churches have felt the need to be so outspoken on these two issues and make a large quantity of people feel that if they support a candidate who approves of one or both of them, they'd be voting for Satan. Largely due to this, the Republican Party has dominated with the Evangelicals in recent elections. Aren't these people preaching about such issues sinning by claiming to be speaking for God? It depresses me that the Republican Party has convinced so many that they're the party of God/morals/family values and the Democratic Party is the party of Satan/evil. Jesus doesn't ever speak of abortion or gay marriage. He speaks of loving all and providing for "the least of us". The GOP has increasingly been representative of only the top 1-2% and have seemed to spit upon those in the lower (and even middle at times) class. Yet, in many's minds, they're the party of God. ::scratches head::

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

Book Ranking Update

Three of my four books are now in the top 100,000, including one of the new two: "The Kind-Hearted Smart Aleck (censored version)" (2011) - 149,246 "The Kind-Hearted Smarta*s (uncensored version)" (2011) - 96,347 "Seasons Come, People Grow: A Poetic Journey" (2006) - 57,336 "The Serious Scale of Sarcasm: More Balanced Than a Drunken High-Heeled Clown On a Tight Rope" (2007) - 39,666 Let's keep those numbers going in the right direction, meaning down, I suppose! (http://www.lulu.com or can be purchased elsewhere)