Skip to main content

Redefining rape

There have been some Republican members of Congress whom have wanted to redefine rape, which would further their cause of attempting to strip rights away from women.

Let me redefine rape for them.

Rape (verb - pronounced rehp): What Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, and the Republican Party suffered on election day - November 6th of 2012 - courtesy of American voters.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/01/31/gop-abortion-bill-redefines-rape.html
Labels:

Comments

  1. HippieGirlNovember 16, 2012 at 3:58 PM

    Ok, let me just list what I think rape is. Last time I checked, rape, according to the dictionary, is forced sexual relations. It's when a person, sometimes a man, sometimes a woman, called an assailant, forces someone, usually a man or woman, to have unwanted sexual relations against his or her will. I've noticed something that I find to be highly unfair. When a woman is on trial for a rape charge, the lawyer for the rapist will somehow turn the words of the woman around to make it sound like she seduced him into having sex and then cried rape or that she supposedly asked for it. I hate that. I'm not really into feminine rights or anything, but I do think that women should get a little justice when on trial for being sexually assaulted

    ReplyDelete
  2. The RozNovember 16, 2012 at 4:38 PM

    Yeah, it's pretty amazing/sad that kind of thing still happens. While I understand the notion of a defendant being innocent until proven guilty, it often times feels as if women accusers of rape are thought to be guilty of lying until they can prove the crime. Unfortunately, some rapes still go unreported for this very reason and others. It's sad, for as hard as women have had to fight to reach where they are today, they still have so much to fight for when it comes to garnering full equality.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more