Skip to main content

Ted Cruz and Galileo are as similar as Madonna and myself

Texas senator, climate-denier, and 2016 Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz made his modest climate change views known when he spoke with the Texas Tribune yesterday, saying this: 

"[Contemporary] global warming alarmists are the equivalent of flat-Earthers. You know it used to be it is accepted scientific wisdom the Earth is flat, and this heretic named Galileo was branded a denier."

The problem with these comments is that, like most of Ted Cruz's opinions, he gets things backwards. Climate-change deniers are the flat-Earthers in this scenario, not the Galileos. 

You see, Ted, many believed the Earth to be flat until science and reasoning proved otherwise. Once it was proven through these measures that the Earth was round and not flat, those whom denied this fact were called deniers or "flat-Earthers." Similarly, while many people may once have doubted the significant impact humans have on this Earth's climate, science and reasoning have proven otherwise. So those whom deny these findings are commonly labeled as climate-deniers or climate-change deniers, akin to flat-Earthers. In other words, Ted, you're a flat-Earther. Congratulations!

Given Cruz's rationale here (or lack there of), expect him to say the following things in the future: 

Cruz: "What's this deal with gravity? Gravity? Seriously? Gravity isn't even real!"

Fact-check: "Gravity is in fact real."

Cruz: "Who do you think you are, Albert Heinstein? Galileo's my middle name!"


Cruz: "I can't stand when people tell me that 2 + 2 = 4. It doesn't equal 4! It equals 7!"

Fact-check: "2 + 2 = 4"

Cruz: "That's such bull crap! What do they know? I tell you what, if Galileo had a doppelganger, that person would be me!"


Cruz: "How could the Earth be round? It just makes no sense. The only things that are round are balloons, balls, and boobs. I'm telling you, the Earth is flat!"

Fact-check: "No, the Earth is not flat; it's round."

Cruz: "Whatever. I'm like Galileo, man."

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/03/25/3638622/ted-cruz-is-like-galileo/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"