Skip to main content

If marriage were like Congress...

I've long said I see Congress to be like a marriage. While Republicans and Democrats may have a differing ideal vision of America and how we reach this ideal, we won't be able to come anywhere close to this ideal without working together. In other words, sacrifices and compromises need to be made to, at the very least, take baby steps forward, if not giant leaps. If one side or the other says no to each and every proposal, unwilling to make any kind of sacrifice or come to any form of compromise, progress will be next to impossible. It's similar to a marriage. The two spouses may have slightly differing ideas on what the perfect marriage or family life is and how to reach that point, but unless the two make some sacrifices along the way and form compromises in the process, the relationship will be all but doomed. Just imagine if a husband and wife behaved the way Congress has been in recent years...

Setting: Mr. and Mrs. Congress' home as they eat dinner in the dining room

Mrs. Congress: "Honey, can you pick up Jr. at school after work tomorrow? His Dungeons & Dragons curling practice ends at 5."

Mr. Congress: "No!"

Mrs. Congress: "Why not?!? I can't get him! I have that job interview I told you about a few days ago!"

Mr. Congress: "Because I don't want to!"

Mrs. Congress: "What?!? You don't think there are times I do things I don't want to do? You think I like cooking for you every night? Cleaning the house once a week? Doing all the dishes and laundry? That weird position you told me about a couple months ago you called 'Frogger on Steroids'? I don't think so!"

Mr. Congress: "What's your point?"

Mrs. Congress: "My point is... Nevermind. I'll just have Uber pick him up again..."

Mr. Congress: "Good"

Mrs. Congress: "Since you won't be picking up Jr. tomorrow and I'll be at the interview, do you think you could at least have something ready to eat by the time I get home? Either cook it yourself or pick it up from somewhere?"

Mr. Congress: "I don't think so."

Mrs. Congress: "Why this time?"

Mr. Congress: "Eh, I just need some relaxation time."

Mrs. Congress: "More?!? You just had a week off for the holidays!"

Mr. Congress: "Yeah, but that's not enough."

Mrs. Congress: "But you're basically retired! ...and are just working part-time!"

Mr. Congress: "So what?"

Mrs. Congress: "Fine... I'll just pick up something on the way back home."

Mr. Congress: "Thanks"

Mrs. Congress: "Well, maybe you can get a head start with cleaning for the weekend then. You know we're having that couples party on Saturday. So could you please help around the house while I'm gone?"

Mr. Congress: "I'd rather not."

Mrs. Congress: "What? What now?"

Mr. Congress: "Some guys I know said that they'd be highly disappointed if a man, like me, cleaned around the house, and they'd forever bully and tease me about it."

Mrs. Congress: "I'm about to bully you right now!"

Mr. Congress: "How come?"

Mrs. Congress: "Because you'll never work with me on anything! I'm like a one man-, I mean, one-woman operation around here! You never compromise!"

Mr. Congress: "Honey?"

Mrs. Congress: "Yes..."

Mr. Congress: "Wanna do that 'Frogger on Steroids' thing again?"

Mrs. Congress: "No!!!"

Mr. Congress: "Geez, Louise, look who's calling who difficult here... Wanna fetch me a beer at least?"

Mrs. Congress: "No!!!"

Mr. Congress: "Alright, fine then, have it your way. I'll get up and grab it myself. It seems like I'm the only one doing any work around here anyway."

Mrs. Congress: "You son of a..."

...and they lived happily ever after, or something...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...