Skip to main content

The rationale of a RWNJ

Last night, I posted an article with the following headline on my Twitter page:

"Track Palin, son of Sarah Palin, allegedly batters girlfriend, waves AR-15 around during drunken fight."

How did one right-wing nut job respond to the headline? Oh, just by saying this:

"Oh yeah?!? Well, Obama wasn't even born in this country!"

No, I'm not sure what her point was either... There was absolutely no connection between the article and the debunked claim that President Obama wasn't born in the United States of America. That's what's called a red herring, perhaps the all-time reddest of herrings...

Given this woman's nonsensical response to the before-mentioned headline, expect for her to respond as follows to future headlines:

Headline: Fast and Furious 197 breaks box-office records

 Her response: "Obama and all other Muslims are taking over this country!"


Headline: Expect snow across the country this Christmas

 Her response: "Come and take my gun, Obama! I dare you!"


Headline: Getting close to a cure for all cancers

 Her response: "Obama's dictatorship is worse than Hitler's!"


Headline: Mass shooting at Texas airport

 Her response: "Global warming is the biggest hoax in history!"


Headline: Strong earthquake rattles Nepal

Her response: "I've got three words: Obamacare!"

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/01/19/sarah_palin_s_son_track_arrested_for_domestic_violence_in_alaska.html
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun...
2 comments
Read more

Mentioned on Crooks and Liars and Hinterland Gazette!

Due to some tweets of mine, I got mentioned on the following two sites (all my tweets can be viewed here -  https://twitter.com/CraigRozniecki ): https://crooksandliars.com/2019/04/trump-gives-stupid-advice-george https://hinterlandgazette.com/2019/03/istandwithschiff-is-trending-after-donald-trump-led-gop-attack-on-adam-schiff-backfires-spectacularly.html
Post a Comment
Read more

Face guarding is legal in college football and the NFL

I just wanted to remind fans and announcers especially, that face guarding is legal in both college football and the NFL. It all comes down to contact. So long as a defender doesn't make contact with an intended receiver, he doesn't have to turn around to play the ball. I can't tell you how many times every week I hear announcers talk about face guarding being a penalty. It's not. I even heard one announcer yesterday state, "If the defender doesn't turn around and play the ball, the ref will call pass interference every time." That's simply not true. Courtesy of referee Bill LeMonnier, he says this with regard to the rule at the college level (answered on 8/12/13): "NCAA rules on pass interference require the face guarding to have contact to be a foul. No contact, no foul by NCAA rules." In the NFL rule book, this is written:  "Actions that constitute defensive pass interference include but are not limited to: (a) Contact by a ...
2 comments
Read more