Skip to main content

Voting anti-establishment doesn't always bring positive change

The only argument I can understand as to why some people still insist on voting for Donald Trump is out of protest. That's it. They see the man as an outsider to the federal government (which isn't entirely true), are angry at the government, and want to see a big shake-up by providing a couple of middle fingers to this nation's capital. In saying that, however, while I can understand these individuals' feelings on the matter, allow me to just say that the "anti-establishment" candidate isn't always the "change-for-the-better" candidate.

Let's think about this for a moment here. With Hillary Clinton, we basically know what she's going to bring to the table as president. Yes, with some slight differentiation, she will bring to Washington a third Obama term. Is that really so bad, though? Under President Obama, we've gone from losing 800,000 jobs a month to regularly gaining 200,000+ jobs per month. We've gone from a large percentage of people without health insurance to a record low percentage of people void of healthcare. We've gone from stagnant wages and increased poverty to increases in wages and decreases in poverty (since 2014). We've gone from a housing crisis to a housing shortage due to how quickly they're selling. We've gone from a war-first and highly-disrespected country to a diplomacy-first and more-respected country. Stocks are up. Equality is improving, especially in the LGBT community. We've attained greater awareness with regard to several causes: Discrimination, police brutality, the criminal justice system, drug reform, global warming, gun violence, etc. So, really, would another 4 such years be THAT bad?

On the other side of the aisle is Donald Trump - a wild card if there ever was one. Sure, he might cast himself as an "outsider," as the "anti-establishment" candidate, but what specifically comes with those labels? The problem is we don't really know. The man has no voting record as a senator or congressman to which we can refer for some guidance on where he's likely to take this nation. He's changed party affiliations more times than he's swapped wives. The man contradicts himself more than Death Valley sees high temperatures in the summer months. Trump's so-called strength - his business record - is spotty at best. So how on earth are we to know what he'll propose if he's elected president, and how is that a good thing? While I can see unpredictability being an occasional positive in a relationship - to maintain some level of excitement which tends to fade with time, I have a difficult time seeing that as a positive when it comes to the leader of the free world. When I vote for a president, I'm voting for him/her because, based on what I've heard/read/researched/thought about, I feel they're the best person for the job in leading this country forward; I'm not voting for them as a flip of the coin, saying, "Heads they'll make America great again; tails they'll destroy the world. I'm willing to take that chance." Do we really want to take that kind of chance with not only our futures, but our children's futures?

If this were a job interview, who would you honestly want to hire? A person with 30+ years experience; a reputation for working with all people; someone who possesses an even temperament; an individual known for a good work ethic, excellent listening skills, and impeccable preparedness; or a person with no experience; someone who often loses their cool (and rather quickly); and someone not known for their work ethic, listening, or preparation? The former, of course. Based on Donald Trump's words, the following is very possible if he wins the November 8th election: 1) Roe v. Wade gets overturned and women lose reproductive rights in the process; 2) Obergefell gets overturned and LGBT couples lose their marriage rights as a result; 3) The Affordable Care Act gets repealed and 20+ million people are again without health insurance; 4) Financial regulations are gutted and we leave ourselves more prone to another recession; 5) We go back to being a war-first country; 6) Citizens United has no shot at being overturned and we continue trending toward an oligarchy; 7) Gun violence and global warming continues being ignored; 8) Discrimination becomes further legitimized; 9) Conspiracies are given precedent over fact-checkers; etc.

I can fully understand why some people are angry at the federal government. I am too to a certain extent, namely with Congress. However, while I supported an "anti-establishment" candidate in Bernie Sanders during the primaries, I will not do so in the general election. Hillary Clinton may be the "same old, same old," but if that means four more years of what we've seen over the past 8, I'll take that any day over the unpredictability of a wild card like Donald Trump. As far as I see it, the choices are quite simple: Further job creation; further expansion of people's rights; and think first, act second (Clinton) vs. another possible recession; the regression of people's rights; and act before thinking (Trump). While I can understand wanting an anti-establishment candidate to be elected president, Donald Trump is not that candidate. Whether we love or loathe her, Hillary Clinton is by far and away the better choice of the two. If we want to see continual progression; to see love Trump hate; and for truth to Trump fear, vote Hillary Clinton.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...