Skip to main content

Post-Bowl Power 5 Conference Breakdown

ACC
Bowl eligible teams: 10 of 14 (71.4%)
Bowl record: 4-6 (.400)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 11-18 (.379)

11 wins
ACC teams: 97-48 (.669)
ACC opponents: 79-62 (.560)
Difference: +0.109
Combined score: 419-235 (average of 38.1 - 21.4 = +16.7)

18 losses
ACC teams: 122-104 (.540)
ACC opponents: 172-64 (.729)
Difference: -0.189
Combined score: 370-646 (average of 20.6 - 35.9 = -15.3)

Overall
ACC teams: 219-152 (.590)
ACC opponents: 251-126 (.666)
Difference: -0.076
Combined score: 789-881 (average of 27.2 - 30.4 = -3.2)


Big XII
Bowl eligible teams: 8 of 10 (80.0%)
Bowl record: 5-3 (.625)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 8-8 (.500)

8 wins
Big XII teams: 75-32 (.701)
Big XII opponents: 59-45 (.567)
Difference: +0.134
Combined score: 307-180 (average of 38.4 - 22.5 = +15.9)

8 losses
Big XII teams: 57-47 (.548)
Big XII opponents: 64-41 (.609)
Difference: -0.061
Combined score: 219-285 (average of 27.4 - 35.6 = -8.2)

Overall
Big XII teams: 132-79 (.626)
Big XII opponents: 123-86 (.589)
Difference: +0.037
Combined score: 526-465 (average of 32.9 - 29.1 = +3.8)


Big Ten
Bowl eligible teams: 8 of 14 (57.1%)
Bowl record: 7-1 (.875)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 14-7 (.667)

14 wins
Big Ten teams: 119-62 (.657)
Big Ten opponents: 99-80 (.553)
Difference:
Combined score: 502-301 (average of 35.9 - 21.5 = +14.4)

7 losses
Big Ten teams: 55-35  (.611)
Big Ten opponents: 63-29 (.685)
Difference: -0.074
Combined score: 147-243 (average of 21.0 - 34.7 = -13.7)

Overall
Big Ten teams: 174-97 (.642)
Big Ten opponents: 162-109 (.598)
Difference: +0.044
Combined score: 649-544 (average of 30.9 - 25.9 = +5.0)


Pac-12
Bowl eligible teams: 9 of 12 (75.0%)
Bowl record: 1-8 (.111)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 8-10 (.444)

8 wins
Pac-12 teams: 60-44 (.577)
Pac-12 opponents: 48-52 (.480)
Difference: +0.097
Combined score: 274-197 (average of 34.3 - 24.6 = +9.7)

10 losses
Pac-12 teams: 78-54 (.591)
Pac-12 opponents: 89-42 (.679)
Difference: -0.088
Combined score: 245-414 (average of 24.5 - 41.4 = -16.9)

Overall
Pac-12 teams: 138-98 (.585)
Pac-12 opponents: 137-94 (.593)
Difference: -0.008
Combined score: 519-611 (average of 28.8 - 33.9 = -5.1)


SEC
Bowl eligible teams: 10 of 14 (71.4%)
Bowl record: 5-6 (.455)
Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame): 11-13 (.458)

11 wins
SEC teams: 110-39 (.738)
SEC opponents: 88-52 (.629)
Difference: +0.109
Combined score: 329-228 (average of 29.9 - 20.7 = +9.2)

13 losses
SEC teams: 94-70 (.573)
SEC opponents:111-60 (.649)
Difference: -0.076
Combined score: 250-431 (average of 19.2 - 33.2 = -14.0)

Overall
SEC teams: 204-109 (.652)
SEC opponents: 199-112 (.640)
Difference: +0.012
Combined score: 579-659 (average of 24.1 - 27.5 = -3.4)


Bowl eligibles
1) Big XII: 80.0%
2) Pac-12: 75.0%
3) ACC: 71.4%
3) SEC: 71.4%
5) Big Ten: 57.1%

Bowl record
1) Big Ten: .875
2) Big XII: .625
3) SEC: .455
4) ACC: .400
5) Pac-12: .111

Record vs. Power 5 (and Notre Dame)
1) Big Ten: .667
2) Big XII: .500
3) SEC: .458
4) Pac-12: .444
5) ACC: .379

Overall Record Differential
1) ACC: -0.076
2) Pac-12: -0.008
3) SEC: +0.012
4) Big XII: +0.037
5) Big Ten: +0.044

Combined score
1) Big Ten: +5.0
2) Big XII: +3.8
3) ACC: -3.2
4) SEC: -3.4
5) Pac-12: -5.1

Overall
1) Big XII: 11 (out of 25)
2) Big Ten: 13 (out of 25)
3) SEC: 16 (out of 25)
4) Pac-12: 18 (out of 25)
5) ACC: 20 (out of 25)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Boycotting jukeboxes because of TouchTunes

I love music and enjoy hitting the bar(s) over the weekend, so naturally, when the mood strikes me, I've never been coy about playing some songs on the jukebox. This past Thursday, a friend of mine turned 50, so several friends of her's, including myself, all met up to celebrate the occasion. At around 9:30, a friend of mine and I both chipped in $5 to play some songs on the jukebox. Four hours and 231 skips later, we gave up on hearing the songs we had selected, and went home knowing we had just wasted $5. This wasn't the first time such a thing had happened to me (and many others), and due to that, I'll be boycotting jukeboxes. Why? The scam known as TouchTunes. You see, here's how the plot typically breaks down. A person (or group of people) downloads the TouchTunes app on his/her phone, consumes one too many adult beverages, and due to this, has less care for spending extra money to hear the songs of their choosing right NOW. That's the thing with TouchTun
2 comments
Read more

The difference between "looking" and "checking out"

I may be way off with these numbers, but it's my approximation that at least 75% of individuals whom are involved in a serious relationship feel it's perfectly acceptable to "check out" members of the opposite sex they're not involved with. Meanwhile, approximately 25% either don't feel this is acceptable or aren't sure about the matter. I hadn't thought about this matter for a while, but since I've been dating a woman for about 8 months, the topic has been pondered about some. When reading or hearing others discuss this very issue, I often times hear comments similar to the following: "It's human nature to look." "There's nothing wrong with checking others out. I'm sure he/she does it too!" "It's fine to do it. Just don't tell your boyfriend/girlfriend about it or do it in front of them!" "It's natural to find people attractive." When observing the array of comments, I i
Post a Comment
Read more

The verdict is in. To no one's surprise, Jonathan Hoenig has been found guilty of being an idiot.

Just recently, when discussing the Michael Brown shooting and whether or not race had anything to do with it, Fox News contributor Jonathan Hoenig said, "You know who talks about race? Racists." One moment while I provide Mr. Hoenig with the well deserved slow-clap. :: slow-claps for two seconds :: So, that was quite the line by Mr. Hoenig, wasn't it? "You know who talks about race? Racists." Well, wasn't he just talking about race? So, by his own words, I guess that makes him a racist. Also, if he wants to be consistent, does this mean that people whom talk about gender are sexists and people whom talk about sexual orientation are homophobes? With that line of thinking, Hoenig would engage in the following back-and-forths: Hoenig: "So, who are you voting for?" A woman: "The Democratic candidate, because he's been adamant about his support for equal rights for women." Hoenig: "You sexist feminist nazi!"
Post a Comment
Read more