Skip to main content

If people voted...

As long time readers should know, I've long been an opponent of the electoral college. Votes in Wyoming shouldn't count for more than votes in California. It should be one person, one vote. Period. In saying that, however, while I'm a stark opponent of the electoral college, I've gotta say, if Democrats actually went out and voted, we'd be next to impossible to stop. Here's how party affiliation numbers break down state by state:

Alabama (9 electoral votes): 52% Rep (Republican), 35% Dem (Democrat), 17% difference (Rep 9, Dem 0)

Alaska (3 EVs): 39% Rep, 32% Dem, 7% diff (Rep 12, Dem 0)

Arizona (11 EVs): 40% Rep, 39% Dem, 1% diff (Rep 23, Dem 0)

Arkansas (6 EVs): 46% Rep, 38% Dem, 8% diff (Rep 29, Dem 0)

California (55 EVs): Dem 49%, Rep 30%, 19% diff (Dem 55, Rep 29)

Colorado (9 EVs): Dem 42%, Rep 41%, 1% diff (Dem 64, Rep 29)

Connecticut (7 EVs): Dem 50%, Rep 32%, 18% diff (Dem 71, Rep 29)

Delaware (3 EVs): Dem 55%, Rep 29%, 26% diff (Dem 74, Rep 29)

District of Columbia (3 EVs): Dem 73%, Rep 11%, 62% diff (Dem 77, Rep 29)

Florida (29 EVs): Dem 44%, Rep 37%, 7% diff (Dem 106, Rep 29)

Georgia (16 EVs): Dem 41%, Rep 41%, 0% diff (Dem 106, Rep 29)

Hawaii (4 EVs): Dem 51%, Rep 28%, 23% diff (Dem 110, Rep 29)

Idaho (4 EVs): Rep 49%, Dem 32%, 17% diff (Dem 110, Rep 33)

Illinois (20 EVs): Dem 48%, Rep 33%, 15% diff (Dem 130, Rep 33)

Indiana (11 EVs): Rep 42%, Rep 37%, 5% diff (Dem 130, Rep 44)

Iowa (6 EVs): Rep 41%, Rep 40%, 1% diff (Dem 130, Rep 50)

Kansas (6 EVs): Rep 46%, Dem 31%, 15% diff (Dem 130, Rep 56)

Kentucky (8 EVs): Rep 44%, Dem 43%, 1% diff (Dem 130, Rep 64)

Louisiana (8 EVs): Dem 43%, Rep 41%, 2% diff (Dem 138, Rep 64)

Maine (4 EVs): Dem 47%, Rep 36%, 11% diff (Dem 142, Rep 64)

Maryland (10 EVs): Dem 55%, Rep 31%, 24% diff (Dem 152, Rep 64)

Massachusetts (11 EVs): Dem 56%, Rep 27%, 29% diff (Dem 163, Rep 64)

Michigan (16 EVs): Dem 47%, Rep 34%, 13% diff (Dem 179, Rep 64)

Minnesota (10 EVs): Dem 46%, Rep 39%, 7% diff (Dem 189, Rep 64)

Mississippi (6 EVs): Rep 44%, Dem 42%, 2% diff (Dem 189, Rep 70)

Missouri (10 EVs): Dem 42%, Rep 41%, 1% diff (Dem 199, Rep 70)

Montana (3 EVs): Rep 49%, Dem 30%, 19% diff (Dem 199, Rep 73)

Nebraska (5 EVs): Rep 47%, Dem 36%, 11% diff (Dem 199, Rep 78)

Nevada (6 EVs): Dem 46%, Rep 37%, 9% diff (Dem 205, Rep 78)

New Hampshire (4 EVs): Dem 44%, Rep 35%, 9% diff (Dem 209, Rep 78)

New Jersey (14 EVs): Dem 51%, Rep 30%, 21% diff (Dem 223, Rep 78)

New Mexico (5 EVs): Dem 48%, Rep 37%, 11% diff (Dem 228, Rep 78)

New York (29 EVs): Dem 53%, Rep 28%, 25% diff (Dem 257, Rep 78)

North Carolina (15 EVs): Dem 43%, Rep 41%, 2% diff (Dem 272, Rep 78)

North Dakota (3 EVs): Rep 50%, Dem 33%, 17% diff (Dem 272, Rep 81)

Ohio (18 EVs): Rep 42%, Dem 40%, 2% diff (Dem 272, Rep 99)

Oklahoma (7 EVs): Rep 45%, Dem 40%, 5% diff (Dem 272, Rep 106)

Oregon (7 EVs): Dem 47%, Rep 32%, 15% diff (Dem 279, Rep 106)

Pennsylvania (20 EVs): Dem 46%, Rep 39%, 7% diff (Dem 299, Rep 106)

Rhode Island (4 EVs): Dem 48%, Rep 30%, 18% diff (Dem 303, Rep 106)

South Carolina (9 EVs): Rep 43%, Dem 39%, 4% diff (Dem 303, Rep 115)

South Dakota (3 EVs): Rep 53%, Dem 37%, 16% diff (Dem 303, Rep 118)

Tennessee (11 EVs): Rep 48%, Dem 36%, 12% diff (Dem 303, Rep 129)

Texas (38 EVs): Dem 40%, Rep 39%, 1% diff (Dem 341, Rep 129)

Utah (6 EVs): Rep 54%, Dem 30%, 24% diff (Dem 341, Rep 135)

Vermont (3 EVs): Dem 57%, Rep 28%, 29% diff (Dem 344, Rep 135)

Virginia (13 EVs): Rep 43%, Dem 39%, 4% diff (Dem 344, Rep 148)

Washington (12 EVs): Dem 44%, Rep 33%, 11% diff (Dem 356, Rep 148)

West Virginia (5 EVs): Rep 43%, Dem 41%, 2% diff (Dem 356, Rep 153)

Wisconsin (10 EVs): Dem 42%, Rep 42%, 0% diff (Dem 356, Rep 153)

Wyoming (3 EVs): Rep 57%, Dem 25%, 32% diff (Dem 356, Rep 156)

Take a look at those numbers. With 26 electoral votes still yet to be decided (Georgia and Wisconsin), the Democratic candidate holds a 200 electoral-vote lead over the Republican nominee. Not only that, but in the 27 "states" (I'm including D.C.) where Democrats hold an advantage in registered voters, the average margin is about 15 percentage points, whereas in the 22 states where Republicans hold the advantage, the average gap is approximately 10 points. Even if the Democratic nominee were to lose all five states where they hold a 5% advantage or less, as well as the two toss-ups, he/she would still earn 276 electoral votes, enough to become president. On the flip-side, Republicans hold a 5% or less advantage in ten states:

Arizona (11 EVs): 1% gap
Indiana (11 EVs): 5%
Iowa (6 EVs): 1%
Kentucky (8 EVs): 1%
Mississippi (6 EVs): 2%
Ohio (18 EVs): 2%
Oklahoma (7 EVs): 5%
South Carolina (9 EVs): 4%
Virginia (13 EVs): 4%
West Virginia (5 EVs): 2%

These nines states are worth 94 electoral votes. So if the Democratic candidate won these contests, along with the two toss-ups, he/she would earn 476 electoral votes. The bottom line is go vote!

http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/compare/party-affiliation/by/state/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Another look at "The Nightly Show" with Larry Wilmore

After its first week, I gave The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore a B+ grade. While I didn't think the show appeared to be perfect by any stretch of the imagination, I also liked the Daily Show  meets Politically Incorrect vibe I got from it, and thought, with the proper adjustments, the show would indeed provide a great fill-in for The Colbert Report . In the show's succeeding weeks, however, I've been less impressed by it and think that if it doesn't make certain adjustments, it could be in jeopardy of losing many long-time viewers of the show's time slot. One major issue I think the show's had to this point is a lack of direction. It's been unable to decide whether it wants to be a comedy show with serious conversation sprinkled in or a serious show with comedy sprinkled in. It's almost as if the show's writers want to give The Nightly Show a Real Time with Bill Maher feel. The problem with that idea or format is the fact Real Time is an hour lon...

My first book review of "Penetrating the Heart of Life: Ambiguous In Thought, Ambivalent In Feeling"

Well, I received my first book review on this poetry-compilation book I completed and published late last year, but have finally gotten around to marketing now. The reviewer gave it 5 out of 5 stars and said: "I enjoyed the poetic journey the writer has taken me on. From darkest days and hopeful optimism to the conclusion of hope realized. The visual images that the poem titled "Room Temperature" elicits, made me think of the song, "Horse With No Name" sung by the band America. In a similar manner, another poem – "Deafening Sigh-lence" reminded me a great deal of Simon & Garfunkel’s song, "The Sound of Silence". There are so many poems in this book that I related to, that I felt a connection to the author and felt that we were traveling on this journey together." http://www.lulu.com/shop/craig-rozniecki/penetrating-the-heart-of-life-ambiguous-in-thought-ambivalent-in-feeling/paperback/product-18677501.html

A closer look at the Scramble With Friends power-ups

I am unashamed to admit that I'm a nerd. My idea of a good time is playing a word game like Boggle or Scrabble. Thankfully, I (and many others) can play such games via Facebook and/or my (our) cell phone(s). While it seems that cheating has become more commonplace in these games (Words With Friends in particular) than San Diego has had nice weather, I've yet to give in to that craze. One element present with the game Scramble With Friends (Boggle) not present in Words With Friends (Scrabble) are legal boosts called "power-ups," which cost a number of tokens from the 15 available. I've now tried all five power-ups, including the latest one which costs money. So, in case anyone's curious about playing the game or giving these power-ups a gander, here's a rundown of them all: Freeze - I think this is probably my favorite of all the power-ups. With the freeze, time stands still for a matter of seconds, which allows you more time to find words and improve...